What? I thought you were predicting a Hillary victory.
I dunno. It's hard to imagine her winning, but at the same time, come on, it's hard to imagine her losing.
In theory, 2008 should be 1980 in reverse. The Republicans are all uniting behind Bush's failed and unpopular policies in Iraq. The Democrats are favored on every issue except for national security, where we're pretty much even. And look at the top GOP contenders: We have a Mormon Flip-flopper, a pro-choicer with a sh**tload of personal baggage, John McCain (no other description required), and some Bush-clone southern conservative. When was the last time a political party has won a Presidential election when their incumbent had an approval rating in the 20s?
However, I figure we nominate Hillary, and the GOP unites behind whatever schmuck they nominate in opposition to her. But then she fuc
ks up somehow: verbal gaffe, poor debate performance, neglecting disgruntled left-wing voters, not attacking an easily-attackable opponent, failure to adequately respond to GOP smear campaigns, you name it. While the GOP nominee gradually moves to the left on the war while still uttering their usual "no surrender" bullsh**t. That takes down Hillary to the 48% of the vote that we've been receiving in 2000 and 2004.
But yeah, I'm probably acting like Tweed in early 2006 when he was predicting a Santorum victory.