Oregon Senate: House Speaker Jeff Merkley to Run Against Gordon Smith
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:43:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Oregon Senate: House Speaker Jeff Merkley to Run Against Gordon Smith
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Oregon Senate: House Speaker Jeff Merkley to Run Against Gordon Smith  (Read 894 times)
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 26, 2007, 08:14:36 AM »

This guy could definitely end up as the Democratic nominee against Gordon Smith. He's a 2nd tier challenger, but that could possibly be enough to get it done.


SALEM, Ore. (AP) — Oregon House Speaker Jeff Merkley plans to file notice with the Federal Election Commission by Aug. 1 that he'll be running for the U.S. Senate against incumbent Republican Gordon Smith, two sources close to the campaign told The Associated Press Tuesday.

http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?/base/news-20/1185323381185390.xml&storylist=orlocal

Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2007, 08:29:46 AM »

I agree, if he is the nominee, he can make the race very competitve
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2007, 08:57:27 AM »

I assume that the Oregon Legislature is as wildly unpopular as just about every other state legislature in the country, so the question begs to be asked: wouldn't even that Steve Novick guy be a better choice to run against Smith than the guy who leads the wildly unpopular legislative branch?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2007, 10:51:26 AM »

I assume that the Oregon Legislature is as wildly unpopular as just about every other state legislature in the country, so the question begs to be asked: wouldn't even that Steve Novick guy be a better choice to run against Smith than the guy who leads the wildly unpopular legislative branch?

Hmmm? I've never had the impression that most state legislatures are particularly unpopular. Perhaps one of our Oregonian posters could enlighten us.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2007, 11:13:14 AM »

I assume that the Oregon Legislature is as wildly unpopular as just about every other state legislature in the country, so the question begs to be asked: wouldn't even that Steve Novick guy be a better choice to run against Smith than the guy who leads the wildly unpopular legislative branch?

Lots of state legislators go on to higher office. Jon Tester was the President of the MT state Senate.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2007, 11:54:51 AM »

why on earth would anyone want to see smith gone?

he is an excellent senator!
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2007, 12:59:06 PM »

Both Oregon and Washington have a tendency to disapprove of their legislature (modestly) in polls during good times, and then deliver solid victories to whatever the incumbent party is.  It doesn't make sense, but it's what happens.

In any case, I doubt that people are going to blacklist him solely for being a member of the state legislature.  I think people here overestimate how much attention most people pay to the state legislature.  I think "second tier" is a good description.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2007, 01:01:52 PM »

In any case, I doubt that people are going to blacklist him solely for being a member of the state legislature.  I think people here overestimate how much attention most people pay to the state legislature.  I think "second tier" is a good description.

Agreed.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2007, 04:54:26 PM »

why on earth would anyone want to see smith gone?

he is an excellent senator!
I'm sure he'd be perfect for Idaho.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2007, 06:39:39 PM »

why on earth would anyone want to see smith gone?

he is an excellent senator!
I'm sure he'd be perfect for Idaho.

he is perfect for america!
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 27, 2007, 12:14:55 AM »

why on earth would anyone want to see smith gone?

he is an excellent senator!
I'm sure he'd be perfect for Idaho.

LOL. He'd be a better fit in New Hampshire than Oregon, maybe (as Oregon is split between fundamentalists and hippies, of which Smith is neither, while New Hampshire is mostly centrist), but not in Idaho.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.