Roe v. Wade Hypothetical

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Roe v. Wade should be overturned.  The central issue in the whole abortion debate is when does a human life begin.  Before that point the state has no business being involved, afterwards the state has every obligation to be involved.  Setting that line is inherently a legislative task, with the judicial task limited to interpreting what the legislature has set.  The Constitution is fairly silent on this issue.  One can infer from the XIVth Amendment that the dividing line between non-human life and human life is no later than birth, since some humans become citizens then.  It would also be not unreasonable for the Court to rule that under its XIVth Amendment powers that Congress could set that line on a national basis.  In the absence of Congressional action, the Xth Amendment would clearly allow the States to set the line in such a case.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

With Sonia Sotomayor pretty much on course to be confirmed to the Supreme Court, I think it's time to bump this...

Why?  I don't see her appointment changing the balance of the court on this issue very much.