General Curtis LeMay: FF or HP?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:51:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  General Curtis LeMay: FF or HP?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: General Curtis LeMay: FF or HP?
#1
Freedom Fighter
 
#2
Horrible Person
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: General Curtis LeMay: FF or HP?  (Read 1937 times)
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 29, 2007, 01:23:02 AM »

Was Curtis LeMay a Freedom Fighter or a Horrible Person?

I think he was a Horrible Person, who said that if the Allies had have lost WWII, he and other U.S. Generals would have been charged as War Criminals.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2007, 03:51:08 AM »

Considering that the Kriegsmarine leadership avoided being tried for using unrestricted submarine warfare only because we did the same thing to the Japanese in the Pacific, LeMay most definitely had a point there.  LeMay was an HP but at least he was honest about being an HP/
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2007, 07:33:45 AM »

A true patriot. America needs more military leaders like him.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2007, 05:43:28 AM »

Horrible Person but quite a character.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2007, 06:41:30 AM »

Freedom Fighter. He's quite revered in many sections of the air force because, in spite of his harsh character, he was known to look after the enlisted men under him - including making sure the enlisted man's married quarters at a new base were constructed speedily, even if it meant the officers had to wait.

He also headed the Berlin Airlift.

And his suggestion that he would be tried for war crimes had we lost had about as much to do with how the German and Japanese governments of the time operated as his actions. The Japanese, after all, routinely tortured and executed downed American pilots, even before LeMay began the fire-bombing of the Home Islands.
Logged
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2007, 01:03:22 PM »

He was a great tactical and strategic general, but I don't think he was too concerned with the long-term effects of his military decisions (beyond whether or not it would help him win the 'war').  So I guess I would call him a great soldier but a mediocre man.
Logged
merseysider
militant centrist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 524


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2007, 04:35:11 PM »

He was a barmpot - George Wallace's running mate in 1968.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2007, 06:17:55 PM »

I think he was a Horrible Person, who said that if the Allies had have lost WWII, he and other U.S. Generals would have been charged as War Criminals.

He was a HP, but that was a surprisingly astute observation of him to make- why would that make him horrible?

The atomic bombings of Japanese civilians were war crimes, period.
Logged
StateBoiler
fe234
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,890


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2007, 07:36:19 AM »

Push.

Ultimately, you need people like LeMay in the military leadership. Not every general, but a couple of them.

My first exposure to him was in the movie "Thirteen Days". In the movie, he was originally conflicted with the Kennedys during the Cuban Missile Crisis but at the end makes a concession that helps out JFK in a plan he's pushing. Not sure how grounded in reality that is, but there you are.

And then he was George Wallace's running mate.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2007, 02:44:36 PM »



And then he was George Wallace's running mate.

Definitely another positive aspect. Smiley
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2007, 07:24:28 PM »



And then he was George Wallace's running mate.

Definitely another positive aspect. Smiley

I disagree. I might have considered the ticket reversed, but Wallace's segregationist stance - albeit one less extreme than many other southern leaders of the time - really turns me off.

Then again, his opponents were Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey; I don't exactly like them much either.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2007, 08:30:26 PM »

HP.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.