Obama's all for sending troops we don't have available at the moment into Pakistan and Sudan. No wonder he wants us out of Iraq, he doesn't want to bring the troops home so we can rebuild our overstrained Army, he just wants to send them elsewhere. Seriously though, as disappointing as Musharraf has been, do we really want to risk toppling him and having Pakistan's A-Bomb fall into the hands of Osama? You'd think Obama would have learned from Bush the idiocy of throwing our military power around without any thought for the consequences.
Agree entirely.
Isn't Obama supposed to be anti-war, or is he only anti-war when its covenient for his political career?
There's a difference between being generically anti-war and being against the Iraq war. Of course this difference is too subtle for Republicans to understand. Turn off the freaking propaganda and learn to think for yourself.
But, don't you;d think he'd learn from Bush's mistakes not to invade a Middle Eastern country without precedent? This guy is jut an idiot, given his recent comments. He clearly is a dimwit on foreign policy and will say a lot about the Democratic party if he wins their nomination. At least Biden, Clinton, and McCain (all of whose foreign policy I disagree with) have a clue at what they're talking about.
