Next state to vote for a Democratic presidential candidate
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 03:49:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Next state to vote for a Democratic presidential candidate		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of the following states will be the next to vote fro a Democratic presidential nominee (last time in parentheses)?
#1
Alaska (1964)		  
#2
Utah (1964)		  
#3
Virginia (1964)		  
#4
Kansas (1964)		  
#5
Wyoming (1964)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Next state to vote for a Democratic presidential candidate  (Read 1928 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 17, 2007, 09:06:50 PM »
I think it's going to Virginia in either 2008 or 2012.  Next likely is Alaska, followed by Wyoming, Kansas, and last, Utah.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2007, 09:40:07 PM »
Virginia. Its already a swing state. Virginia, Florida, NC and in the looong run SC
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2007, 09:53:27 PM »
Virginia is the only one that's likely in the next 25 years, Kansas and/or Alaska as an outside chance if there's a landslide.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2007, 08:21:40 PM »
Virginia, Kansas if Siebelius is nominated.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2007, 08:29:33 PM »
Why do people keep putting Kansas down? I don't see how Kansas going dem is realistic outside of the dems winning the same number of states Reagan did in '84.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2007, 08:36:07 PM »
I'm just saying that a Sebelius nomination would close to clinch Kansas, I just got back from there and everyone I talked to liked her.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2007, 08:39:55 PM »
Kansas is a strong GOP state for a reason dude.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2007, 01:33:45 AM »
Virginia. It's a possibility that the Democrats could win it in 2008, however they have a more realistic chance of winning it in 2012. And Kansas probably wouldn't even give it's electoral votes to Sebelius if she was nominated. It would be close, but the GOP would still win it.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2007, 01:40:00 AM »
Why didnīt you include IN, because then the results would not be this biased in favor of VA Wink
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2007, 08:08:35 AM »
Quote from: Tender Branson on August 21, 2007, 01:40:00 AM
Why didnīt you include IN, because then the results would not be this biased in favor of VA Wink
Why do you hate VA?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2007, 08:16:05 AM »
Quote from: Lance. McSteel on August 21, 2007, 08:08:35 AM
Quote from: Tender Branson on August 21, 2007, 01:40:00 AM
Why didnīt you include IN, because then the results would not be this biased in favor of VA Wink
Why do you hate VA?

Iīm not really hating it, because if IN takes a KY-like swing towards the Democrats (which is not really possible) it comes right next after VA. We have not seen any General Election polls out of IN, but a D: 46% - R: 54% race could be possible in the next presidential elections, with the right candidate.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2007, 03:09:40 PM »
Actually you don't really need a competent dem candidate. You just need the right to split with the Tancredo-ites forming their own group.
Logged
Sensei
senseiofj324
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,532
Panama


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2007, 08:32:30 PM »
VA, without a doubt
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 13 queries.