SurveyUSA August 2007 Senate Approval Ratings
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:14:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  SurveyUSA August 2007 Senate Approval Ratings
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SurveyUSA August 2007 Senate Approval Ratings  (Read 3550 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2007, 01:04:43 AM »

Alabama:

Shelby: 57-33
Sessions: 59-33 - Up for Re-election 2008

California:

Feinstein: 52-41
Boxer: 50-44

Iowa:

Grassley: 63-28
Harkin: 57-35 - Up for Re-election 2008

Kansas:

Brownback: 47-45 - Running for President 2008
Roberts: 54-33 - Up for Re-election 2008

Kentucky:

McConnell: 50-43 - Up for Re-election 2008
Bunning: 41-48

Massachusetts:

Kennedy: 62-33
Kerry: 47-45 - Up for Re-election 2008

Minnesota:

Coleman: 47-44 - Up for Re-election 2008
Klobuchar: 58-33

Missouri:

Bond: 54-38
McCaskill: 53-41

New Mexico:

Domenici: 52-41 - Up for Re-election 2008
Bingaman: 61-31

New York:

Schumer: 58-31
Clinton: 64-34 - Running for President 2008

Ohio:

Voinovich: 40-50
Brown: 41-44

Oregon:

Wyden: 58-33
Smith: 46-44 - Up for Re-election 2008

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42

Washington:

Murray: 54-38
Cantwell: 53-38

Wisconsin:

Kohl: 57-35
Feingold: 51-43

http://www.surveyusa.com/50StateTracking.html
Logged
Jaggerjack
Fabian_the_Fastman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,369
Thailand


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2007, 01:15:04 AM »

It almost pains me to see Session's approvals so high.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2007, 10:34:29 PM »

Surprisingly bad numbers for Smith and Brownback (though Brownback's not up for reelection until 2010, and he's clearly not winning the Presidential nomination). The others are uninteresting or expected.

Ohio seems to have become the new New Jersey: they hate everyone.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2007, 11:04:08 PM »

Surprisingly bad numbers for Smith and Brownback (though Brownback's not up for reelection until 2010, and he's clearly not winning the Presidential nomination). The others are uninteresting or expected.

Ohio seems to have become the new New Jersey: they hate everyone.

They seem to love Strickland.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2007, 01:11:34 AM »

I'm surprised no one's paying SUSA to poll Graham's popularity yet.  While the lack of any hint of a credible challenger might have something to do with that, one would think it would at the least be an interesting crosstab for the presidential primary polling (along with support for DeMint and Sanford).
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2007, 02:06:43 AM »

I am amazed Brown has net negatives.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2007, 09:38:46 PM »
« Edited: August 24, 2007, 09:40:28 PM by Frodo »

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42


Why are Jim Webb's numbers so mediocre?  Nothing readily comes to mind since I haven't heard much from him since he took office. 
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2007, 10:40:15 PM »

The only thing in the world he had going for him was not being George Allen.  Virginia has shifted, but kiddie porn and misogyny are still a tough sell there.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2007, 12:04:28 AM »

I am amazed Brown has net negatives.

I'm still rather shocked he defeated Mike DeWine. DeWine was such more of a well known name around Ohio...and Ohioans tend to elect the better known, better talked about candidates. Many...including myself...had no idea who Sherrod Brown was...and I actually pictured an African American woman when I heard the name (as did Rush Limbaugh, coincidently). To have him win a double digit victory against a well known Senator DeWine...it was a bit of a shock.

Since then...he has done nothing...and hopefully won't be in the Senate too long.
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2007, 12:07:38 AM »


Insert obligatory refutation here.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2007, 01:38:25 AM »

I'm still rather shocked he defeated Mike DeWine.

I'm not.  DeWine did nothing to distinguish himself and acted as if he were trying to lose by a larger margin than Santorum.  (Close, but no cigar.)

I'm sorry Brown won, but I'll miss DeWine less than Allen, Burns, Santorum, and Talent.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2007, 01:54:04 AM »

The only thing in the world he had going for him was not being George Allen.  Virginia has shifted, but kiddie porn and misogyny are still a tough sell there.

Ah yes the Allen "kiddie porn" attack... that worked out real well for him.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2007, 02:06:44 AM »

I am amazed Brown has net negatives.

I'm still rather shocked he defeated Mike DeWine. DeWine was such more of a well known name around Ohio...and Ohioans tend to elect the better known, better talked about candidates. Many...including myself...had no idea who Sherrod Brown was...and I actually pictured an African American woman when I heard the name (as did Rush Limbaugh, coincidently). To have him win a double digit victory against a well known Senator DeWine...it was a bit of a shock.

Since then...he has done nothing...and hopefully won't be in the Senate too long.

His victory and the margin shouldn't have been much of a surprise.....
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2007, 02:16:50 AM »

I'm sorry Brown won, but I'll miss DeWine less than Allen, Burns, Santorum, and Talent.

That's strange.  You seem to have forgotten Lincoln Chafee.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2007, 03:02:53 AM »

Lol, the only thing some of these hicks have is slander. Are the media who reported on Foley kiddie porn peddlers?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2007, 09:30:51 AM »

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42


Why are Jim Webb's numbers so mediocre?  Nothing readily comes to mind since I haven't heard much from him since he took office. 

Perhaps b/c he is a mediocre Senator?  Wink
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2007, 11:44:31 AM »

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42


Why are Jim Webb's numbers so mediocre?  Nothing readily comes to mind since I haven't heard much from him since he took office. 

Perhaps b/c he is a mediocre Senator?  Wink

I know that comment is tongue-in-cheek, but for the sake of argument, why do you say that?  How is he mediocre? 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2007, 12:11:04 PM »

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42


Why are Jim Webb's numbers so mediocre?  Nothing readily comes to mind since I haven't heard much from him since he took office. 

Perhaps b/c he is a mediocre Senator?  Wink

I know that comment is tongue-in-cheek, but for the sake of argument, why do you say that?  How is he mediocre? 

Sam Spade dislikes Democrats, Frodo.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2007, 12:20:30 PM »

Virginia:

Warner: 57-33 - Up for Re-election 2008
Webb: 48-42


Why are Jim Webb's numbers so mediocre?  Nothing readily comes to mind since I haven't heard much from him since he took office. 

Perhaps b/c he is a mediocre Senator?  Wink

I know that comment is tongue-in-cheek, but for the sake of argument, why do you say that?  How is he mediocre? 

It was only tongue-in-cheek, Frodo, nothing meant by it.  He was (and still is) not one of the best new Democrats on my Senate list for 2007 - but that is nothing different from what I have said in the past.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2007, 03:53:28 PM »

Bob Casey is, right?
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2007, 07:26:19 PM »

That's strange.  You seem to have forgotten Lincoln Chafee.

You seem to be deliberately dense.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.