Coalition to Protect Preferential Voting

[CheeseWhiz]

Sign me up!  Just because we find one small problem doesn't mean we need to change back to something with several problems (first past the post.)  I'd be okay with Approval voting, but I like Preferential much better.

[Speed of Sound]

Sign me up, too! theres no need for these kind of changes, this system works just fine.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Thank you Cheese and LiberalPA!  Everyone should note that this anti-PV stuff popped up almost the same time last year.  I suppose its like annual forum PMS.

[Speed of Sound]

I suppose its like annual forum PMS.

EVERYONE DUCK AND COVER![/color][/b] lol

[The Duke]

Agreed, but the anti-reformers who oppose PV around here want to mandate a two party system.  Blues and Reds would never have nominated Gus or any other moderate.

I STRONGLY disagree.  Who would have nominated Gustaf?

The UAC came into existence before Preferential voting. Its reasonable to assume from the disarray of the GOP/ANP/SRP/CPP that the UAC would have still run Gus.

This is wrong, in the first election Supersoulty was the GOP nominee, and had the GOP not been broken up by the UAC, I'd have been the second GOP nominee.

[PBrunsel]

I'll join. I like our system and i'm glad that we have it.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Perhaps you, but not Gus or social moderates.  Keep in mind that when I say "moderate", I mean real...er... social moderates

Agreed, but the anti-reformers who oppose PV around here want to mandate a two party system.  Blues and Reds would never have nominated Gus or any other moderate.

I STRONGLY disagree.  Who would have nominated Gustaf?

The UAC came into existence before Preferential voting. Its reasonable to assume from the disarray of the GOP/ANP/SRP/CPP that the UAC would have still run Gus.

This is wrong, in the first election Supersoulty was the GOP nominee, and had the GOP not been broken up by the UAC, I'd have been the second GOP nominee.

[The Duke]

Perhaps you, but not Gus or social moderates.  Keep in mind that when I say "moderate", I mean real...er... social moderates

Agreed, but the anti-reformers who oppose PV around here want to mandate a two party system.  Blues and Reds would never have nominated Gus or any other moderate.

I STRONGLY disagree.  Who would have nominated Gustaf?

The UAC came into existence before Preferential voting. Its reasonable to assume from the disarray of the GOP/ANP/SRP/CPP that the UAC would have still run Gus.

This is wrong, in the first election Supersoulty was the GOP nominee, and had the GOP not been broken up by the UAC, I'd have been the second GOP nominee.

Er,  my social score on the Compass is left of center.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Thank you Mr. President.

I'll join. I like our system and i'm glad that we have it.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Arrgh... stop being right already!

Perhaps you, but not Gus or social moderates.  Keep in mind that when I say "moderate", I mean real...er... social moderates

Agreed, but the anti-reformers who oppose PV around here want to mandate a two party system.  Blues and Reds would never have nominated Gus or any other moderate.

I STRONGLY disagree.  Who would have nominated Gustaf?

The UAC came into existence before Preferential voting. Its reasonable to assume from the disarray of the GOP/ANP/SRP/CPP that the UAC would have still run Gus.

This is wrong, in the first election Supersoulty was the GOP nominee, and had the GOP not been broken up by the UAC, I'd have been the second GOP nominee.

Er,  my social score on the Compass is left of center.

[Defarge]

I too shall join.  The current system is fine, if not better than the real life version.

[Platypus]

Itr seems like we're always under attack. Time to rally the troops once more, Don.