1960 JFK Picks Paul Douglas For VP. What Happens? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:57:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1960 JFK Picks Paul Douglas For VP. What Happens? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1960 JFK Picks Paul Douglas For VP. What Happens?  (Read 3597 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« on: September 09, 2007, 11:59:39 AM »
« edited: September 09, 2007, 12:09:35 PM by Tammany Hall Republican »

In 1960, Democratic Presidential candidate Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts and his top advisors come to the conclusion that the 1960 Presidential election will be decided in the crucial battleground states of the midwest, with Illinois being crucial to their hopes of victory.  They reason they have been historically strong in the south, both in 1952 and in 1956, and believe they will be able to hold onto most their southern strength in 1960. 

The name of experienced and respected Illinois Senator Paul H. Douglas, U.S. Senator since 1949, comes up immediately in the Vice Presidential deliberations.  Douglas is a Protestant, he has a distinguished military record of service, earning two purple hearts, and politically, Douglas has an impressive record as a strong advocate of equal rights for African Americans, while at the same time fighting for fiscal discipline, environmental protection, public housing, and truth in lending laws.

Although 68 years old, Douglas is in excellent health, and is an aggressive and tenacious campaigner.  Douglas is still 3 years younger than the successful 1948 Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Alben W. Barkley.         

A decision is therefore reached on the Vice Presidential nomination, and John F. Kennedy puts in a call to Senator Douglas, asking him to be his Vice Presidential running mate.  Douglas graciously accepts the offer, and wins unanimous and enthusiastic endorsement from the Democratic National Convention.  Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, the Senate Majority Leader, formally nominates Douglas for the Vice Presidency, and delivers a rousing and dramatic speech in behalf of the Douglas Vice Presidential candidacy.  The Democrats enter the 1960 Presidential election united solidly behind their ticket.

The Republicans, as expected, nominate Vice President Richard M. Nixon for President, and Nixon picks former Massachusetts Senator and former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Henry Cabot Lodge for Vice President.

Republican
For President, Vice President Richard M. Nixon of California
For Vice President, Former Senator and former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts

Democrat
For President, Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts
For Vice President, Senator Paul H. Douglas of Illinois

Does the Democrats "midwest strategy" work?

How does this 1960 election turn out? 

Maps? 
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2007, 09:01:08 PM »

In other words, pursuing a midwestern strategy, and not going with LBJ for VP, darn near costs JFK the election.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2007, 09:47:01 PM »

How Nixon could conceivably have won in 1960, with the Democrats pursuing a midwest strategy, and JFK choosing Douglas for VP

Nixon/Lodge                269
Kennedy/Douglas        249
Unpledged Electors       19

Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2007, 11:56:04 PM »



nixon/lodge: 51%,  266 EVs
kennedy/douglas: 48%, 252 EVs
unpledged electors: 19 EVs

douglas costs kennedy the south.

the election goes to the house.  kennedy is elected.

Walter, thank you for your interesting election results.

I realize under these circumstances with no candidate receiving a majority in the electoral college, the House election is completely constitutional, however, with Nixon receiving a majority in the popular vote, and falling just short of an electoral college majority, would this not enrage the public for the House to elect Kennedy?

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.