Democrats: Is there ANY scenario in which you would possibly vote for Nader?

[they don't love you like i love you]

No. None, period.

Not even if it's Hillary as the nominee and she leads by 30 points in Minnesota. Not even if I lived in DC. No matter how upset I am with the nominee, Nader is NEVER an option. Under no circumstances whatsoever should Nader EVER be an option for ANY leftist.

[Joe Republic]

Still not getting the message, are you?

[Tetro Kornbluth]

I'd love to try and defend Nader but really there is no point given the level of hackinessness in your posts about him and your love-in type polls. So all I'll say is this:

[they don't love you like i love you]

I'd love to try and defend Nader but really there is no point given the level of hackinessness in your posts about him and your love-in type polls. So all I'll say is this:

Why would you want to defend such a pro-censorship authoritarian James Dobson lover in the first place?

[Tetro Kornbluth]

I'd love to try and defend Nader but really there is no point given the level of hackinessness in your posts about him and your love-in type polls. So all I'll say is this:

Why would you want to defend such a pro-censorship authoritarian James Dobson lover in the first place?

*Sigh*. I support his right to run in an election for president of the United States as his is constitutional right under the US constitution.
 - I support his right not to be a media\corporate hack like Al Gore was\is\always has been in putting himself forward for the presidency.
 - I support his right to call for material to be banned or him to be concerned about pornography\video games\violent movies\whatever - That does not mean I want them banned; only that I believe that Nader has right to say that he wished things to be banned. Plus I'm concerned about plently of those things too; even though I dabble in them.

Understand?

[Governor PiT]

if Hillary is the nomine maybe. but I think conservatives are more likely to vote for a 3rd party if Giuliani is the nomine.

[MAS117]

NO[/size][/size][/size][/size]

[Eraserhead]

No. Even if Hillary is the nominee there are always other options. Maybe Walt Brown will run again.

[Speed of Sound]

No. Even if Hillary is the nominee there are always other options. Maybe Walt Brown will run again.

Ugh, I hope not. That campaign was a failure, through and through, even for a socialist. We need to pick someone else, someone that doesnt need to read planks off of cards. -_-

[Eraserhead]

No. Even if Hillary is the nominee there are always other options. Maybe Walt Brown will run again.

Ugh, I hope not. That campaign was a failure, through and through, even for a socialist. We need to pick someone else, someone that doesnt need to read planks off of cards. -_-

I found him amusing at the time. Did you support him in '04?

[Kaine for Senate '18]

No chance in hell.

[Sensei]

LaRouche vs Brownback sounds like a good place for a Nader vote.

[Eraserhead]

LaRouche vs Brownback sounds like a good place for a Nader vote.

LaRouche vs Brownback sounds like a good election for a suicide pact.

[memphis]

I might vote for him for biggest douche in the universe.

[they don't love you like i love you]

I might vote for him for biggest douche in the universe.

Yes, that's the only way I'd vote for him.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3514799

[they don't love you like i love you]

*Sigh*. I support his right to run in an election for president of the United States as his is constitutional right under the US constitution.

So why not make as much of a fuss for the Constitution Party?

- I support his right not to be a media\corporate hack like Al Gore was\is\always has been in putting himself forward for the presidency.

That's why Gore was the candidate all the corporations wanted in 2000, right?

- I support his right to call for material to be banned or him to be concerned about pornography\video games\violent movies\whatever - That does not mean I want them banned; only that I believe that Nader has right to say that he wished things to be banned.

Sure he has the right to call for that. The question is whether you want someone calling for that to be President.

The Constitution Party and Libertarians have a right to call for the loony things they do too...

Plus I'm concerned about plently of those things too; even though I dabble in them.

What the hell is there to be concerned about?

[Gabu]

Yes, I would vote for Nader if the Democrat was definitely going to win, just so I could tell you that I voted for Nader.

[Lief 🗽]

I vote for the most progressive candidate that has a shot of winning. Until Nader is that, no, I won't vote for him.

[they don't love you like i love you]

I vote for the most progressive candidate that has a shot of winning.

So by that logic, in Oklahoma next year you'd vote for Inhofe? He'd be the most progressive candidate with a shot at winning, as he is the ONLY one with a chance at winning.

Until Nader is that, no, I won't vote for him.

Nader will never be that, chance at winning or not, because he is not progressive.

[Lief 🗽]

I vote for the most progressive candidate that has a shot of winning.

So by that logic, in Oklahoma next year you'd vote for Inhofe? He'd be the most progressive candidate with a shot at winning, as he is the ONLY one with a chance at winning.

Until Nader is that, no, I won't vote for him.

Nader will never be that, chance at winning or not, because he is not progressive.

The progressive candidate with the best chance of winning, whatever.

And Ralph Nader is more progressive than the Republicans, and many conservative Democrats. A few "nanny-statist" positions does not make you a fascist.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Sure, it's very progressive to attack Michael Moore by calling him a "beachball", own stock in Halliburton, and consider James Dobson to be preferable to Al Gore.

[Eraserhead]

I might vote for him for biggest douche in the universe.

John Edward already won that.

[memphis]

I might vote for him for biggest douche in the universe.

John Edward already won that.

I'm glad somebody caught my reference.

[Hatman 🍁]

Yeah, I would vote Nader if I didn't live in a swing state... and was an American. And, I'd be thinking of you, BRTD when I did it to.

[Tetro Kornbluth]

*Sigh*. I support his right to run in an election for president of the United States as his is constitutional right under the US constitution.

So why not make as much of a fuss for the Constitution Party?

- I support his right not to be a media\corporate hack like Al Gore was\is\always has been in putting himself forward for the presidency.

That's why Gore was the candidate all the corporations wanted in 2000, right?

- I support his right to call for material to be banned or him to be concerned about pornography\video games\violent movies\whatever - That does not mean I want them banned; only that I believe that Nader has right to say that he wished things to be banned.

Sure he has the right to call for that. The question is whether you want someone calling for that to be President.

The Constitution Party and Libertarians have a right to call for the loony things they do too...

Plus I'm concerned about plently of those things too; even though I dabble in them.

What the hell is there to be concerned about?

Maybe because you haven't the spam forum going on about how 'fascist' and 'disgusting' either the Libertarian or Constitution parties are?

As for all the Corporations not wanting Gore, all I can say is LOL. And here I won't talk about his media slutishness.