should the Republicans give up on VA & NH?? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:48:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  should the Republicans give up on VA & NH?? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the GOp just give up on the NH & VA Senate seats?
#1
yes to both
 
#2
no to both
 
#3
yes to Va no to NH
 
#4
yes to NH no to VA
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: should the Republicans give up on VA & NH??  (Read 3101 times)
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« on: September 15, 2007, 12:26:06 PM »

Look at it this way, if I was Rep. Tom Davis no way in hell would I opt for a Senate run against Warner. I'd seek re-election to VA-11 then opt for either a run for governor in 2009 or a run against Webb in 2012

Dave

Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2007, 12:36:16 PM »

They should probably give up on New Hampshire.  And (if I were them) Republicans should definitely not yet give up on Virginia -the best Mark Warner can hope for (against either Davis or Gilmore) is a 55 to 45 victory, given the residual conservatism of the state.  More likely he would win a percentage just slightly short of that. 

So no chance whatsoever of Warner having a Bayh-style Indiana (a somewhat more conservative and Republican state) margin of victory? Of course, Bayh's Senate opponents were somewhat bottom-drawer. Neither Davis or Gilmore fit that description

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2007, 12:44:43 PM »


Compared to Davis, he undoubtedly is Wink. Wasn't that much of a governor by most accounts but that doesn't mean to say he'd not poll respectably (low 40s)

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2007, 12:59:16 PM »

Calling Gilmore a high quality candidate would be like calling Bob Taft one if he ran again in Ohio.

Believe me, I'd enjoy a Warner vs Gilmore race Wink

Dave
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 15 queries.