Judicial scandals?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:41:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Judicial scandals?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Judicial scandals?  (Read 1057 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2007, 03:12:19 PM »

It seems we are constantly bombarded with outrageous scandals from the executive and legislative branches of government. When was the last time we had a really juicy judicial scandal? The only thing I can think of off hand is the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill mess, and that seems pretty mild by political comparison.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2007, 03:24:49 PM »



They're too busy reading to get in trouble.  Tongue
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2007, 03:54:34 PM »

How about that judge who sued the Korean dry cleaner for $52 million over a pair of pants?
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2007, 05:12:19 PM »

It seems we are constantly bombarded with outrageous scandals from the executive and legislative branches of government. When was the last time we had a really juicy judicial scandal? The only thing I can think of off hand is the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill mess, and that seems pretty mild by political comparison.

Not so much a "scandal," but two years back, a justice on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court became the first to be denied reconfirmation by the voters because he conspired with the State Legislature to craft an unconstitutional pay raise bill in a way that would pass judicial scrutiny.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2007, 10:33:47 PM »

If judges want to make a lot of money, they leave the bench and go into private practice.  If judges don't, they stay on the bench and enjoy telling you whether you lose or win in your disputes, that and playing golf.  And if you're on the Supreme Court, you control the entire country - who'd want to leave that job.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2007, 10:39:29 PM »

It seems we are constantly bombarded with outrageous scandals from the executive and legislative branches of government. When was the last time we had a really juicy judicial scandal? The only thing I can think of off hand is the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill mess, and that seems pretty mild by political comparison.

Not so much a "scandal," but two years back, a justice on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court became the first to be denied reconfirmation by the voters because he conspired with the State Legislature to craft an unconstitutional pay raise bill in a way that would pass judicial scrutiny.

I don't think he "conspired," but his ruling confirmed the legality of the act.

One state Superior Count Judge (the first appeal level in PA) was indicted on federal charges in August:

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/paw/pr/2007_august/2007_08_15_1.html

State Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen, was convicted of getting prescription drugs under another name and impeached in the mid-1990's.

Cambria County Judge Joseph O'Kicki was convicted on numerous bribery charges in the early 1990's (he lost the retention vote in 1991, IIRC) and fled to Slovenia before he was suppose to report to jail.  (I actually met him once, while he was a judge.)

Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2007, 07:55:50 AM »

They're too busy reading to get in trouble.  Tongue

Exactly - that's why we need to support the Read The Bills Act. If we get our congressmen and our president reading, they won't have time to screw up and make our country look stupid.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2007, 06:21:30 PM »

They're too busy reading to get in trouble.  Tongue

Exactly - that's why we need to support the Read The Bills Act. If we get our congressmen and our president reading, they won't have time to screw up and make our country look stupid.
If the Read the Bills Act ever goes into law, it would be because it would be slipped into a pork bill and no one bothered to read it. Come on, you know that has to be the case. Wink
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2007, 07:49:48 AM »

They're too busy reading to get in trouble.  Tongue

Exactly - that's why we need to support the Read The Bills Act. If we get our congressmen and our president reading, they won't have time to screw up and make our country look stupid.
If the Read the Bills Act ever goes into law, it would be because it would be slipped into a pork bill and no one bothered to read it. Come on, you know that has to be the case. Wink

Yeah, which I why I support doing that. Grin
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.