CO - Udall and Schaffer tied in new poll
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:16:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CO - Udall and Schaffer tied in new poll
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO - Udall and Schaffer tied in new poll  (Read 1224 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 04, 2007, 11:38:28 PM »

Poll: Udall, Schaffer in dead heat for Senate

Associated Press
Originally published 03:33 p.m., Oktober 4, 2007
Updated 03:33 p.m., Oktober 4, 2007

Democrat Mark Udall and Republican Bob Schaffer are in a close race for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Republican Sen. Wayne Allard in what is shaping up to be one of the top races in next year's election, according to a poll released today by pollster Floyd Ciruli.

Ciruli said there are still 14 months to go until the election, but both campaigns are working hard to get the $30 million Ciruli believes will be spent on the race before it's over.

According to Ciruli's poll, Udall has 36 percent of voter support and Schaffer 35 percent, with 9 percent hoping someone else will join the race and 21 percent undecided.

The poll, taken in mid-September, had a margin of error of 4.4 percentage points. It was part of a telephone survey of 504 voters statewide on economic development sponsored by the Economic Development Council of Colorado.

Ciruli said Schaffer is attracting a lower percentage of voters from Republicans, Democrats and the unaffiliated, but there are 130,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats, keeping Schaffer competitive.

"It's still very early in the campaign, but Schaffer's challenge will be to unify his party and attract more unaffiliated voters as the public begins to make up its mind," Ciruli said.

The poll showed Udall with 72 percent support from his own party, 6 percent from Republicans and 34 percent from the unaffiliated, while Schaffer got 68 percent support from his own party, 3 percent from Democrats and 19 percent unaffiliated.

Udall has an 11-point advantage among women and Schaffer leads by 8 points among men.

Walt Klein, Schaffer's top campaign consultant, said Udall and fellow Democrats became "arrogant" after Democrats took a U.S.

Senate seat two years ago and the governor's office away from Republicans and believe the U.S. Senate race this year is theirs to lose.

Klein said the wins by Democratic Sen. Ken Salazar and Gov. Bill Ritter were different, because neither candidate had a record.

Klein said it's different between Udall, a five-term congressman, and Schaffer, who served three terms in Congress.

Klein said the poll shows Colorado is still a swing state.

"It's like a cold bucket of water in the faces of Democrats.

This state has not turned blue. It's still purple," he said.

Mike Melanson, Udall's campaign manager, said Schaffer is having trouble with his Republican base because he opposed Referendum C, a measure approved by voters to shore up the state budget and had support from many Republicans, including business leaders.

Melanson said this Senate race will be one of the top races in the nation, and no one is taking it for granted.

Schaffer's campaign said it raised $717,000 during the second quarter after getting a late start and has not filed a report for the third quarter. Udall, who began raising money in the first quarter, has raised $3.8 million, including $1.5 million transferred over from his congressional campaign fund.

http://dailycamera.com/news/2007/oct/04/poll-udall-schaffer-dead-heat-senate/
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2007, 11:39:37 PM »
« Edited: October 04, 2007, 11:45:50 PM by Verily »

Economic Development Council for Colorado... right-wing or left-wing? (Sounds like a local Club for Growth to me, but I don't really know.)
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2007, 12:01:52 AM »

Economic Development Council for Colorado... right-wing or left-wing? (Sounds like a local Club for Growth to me, but I don't really know.)

They have a Legislator of the Year award on their site, the last 10 recipients were all Republican. 
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2007, 12:10:04 AM »

Economic Development Council for Colorado... right-wing or left-wing? (Sounds like a local Club for Growth to me, but I don't really know.)

They have a Legislator of the Year award on their site, the last 10 recipients were all Republican. 

Okay. So it should be treated like a Schaffer internal.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2007, 12:19:12 AM »

Who the heck are Floyd Ciruli?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,726


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2007, 02:38:08 AM »

Junk poll
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2007, 11:47:20 AM »

Ciruli Associates' 2004 efforts in Colorado were inaccurate and Republican-friendly.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2007, 12:41:44 PM »

Ciruli Associates' 2004 efforts in Colorado were inaccurate and Republican-friendly.

Eh, but that doesn't really tell the whole story.  Ciruli's problem to me has always been that it doesn't push the "leaning" undecideds enough, which is ok at this point in the venture, but weak later on.

For example, Ciruli missed the Colorado '06 Governors race by being 7% too Republican (24% undecideds), missed the Colorado '02 Senate race by being 6% too Democrat (17% undecideds) and missed the Colorado '02 Senate race by being 7% too Republican (12% undecided - not counting that late undecideds always break for the challenger in blowouts).

Anyway, I simply wouldn't trust the poll b/c it was conducted for a private organization for no stated reason more than anything else.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.