Jindal: 46%
Boasso: 10%
Georges: 9%
Campbell: 6%
Undecided: 29%
The poll of 641 registered voters was conducted Oct. 1 to Oct. 6 by the Southeastern Social Science Research Center at Southeastern in Hammond. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percent.
In 2003, the university released a poll showing Jindal and then Lt. Gov. Kathleen Blanco were neck and neck less than a week before the runoff election. Blanco, a Democrat, won by four percentage points.
http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/10446687.html
Honestly, how can they truly call this accurate when thats all they poll in a state of millions? It makes no sense to me
As long as you have a truly random sample, there is a 95 percent proability that the race is within the stated margin of error.
The trick with getting a good poll is getting a truly random sample, and ensuring that every voter has an exactly equal chance of being polled. Obviously it's impossible to get a 100 percent random sample in reality, but firms such as Mason Dixon are obviously coming quite close given how accurate they tend to be.
