Is Clinton peaking too early? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:31:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Is Clinton peaking too early? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is Clinton peaking too early?  (Read 3874 times)
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,976


« on: October 14, 2007, 09:02:23 AM »

In the last generation, Republian primaries have worked this way- the nominee is pretty clear early on. Dems have tended to wait to really decide.

I tend to agree with your sentiment about the third inning, but, on the other hand, the Republican trend has worked pretty well for them seven out of the last ten elections.

In terms of "we are going to decide," no, we're not. Not a single vote has been cast, nor has a Democrat dropped out. Some have made the analogy that Howard Dean peaked to early and we see he didn't win the nomination, but Dean was leading the polls with not much more than 20% in a crowded field. Hillary often has double that in polls, in a sort of crowded field and sort of a three way field.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 15 queries.