N.J. to vote on abolishing death penalty (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:26:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  N.J. to vote on abolishing death penalty (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: N.J. to vote on abolishing death penalty  (Read 3474 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« on: November 12, 2007, 09:13:12 PM »

"We live in dangerous times," said Sen. Gerald Cardinale. "While there are problems with the way the death penalty is administered in New Jersey, abolishing it is not the solution."

Stupid Cardinale. Shouldn't he know that New Jersey hasn't executed anyone since it became legal to do so anyway?

I also really, really hate the "families of victims" who argue in favor of the death penalty; they go on and on about "closure" when all they really want is vengeance.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2007, 11:01:22 PM »

How would NJ a "beacon on a hill"?  11 states have already banned the death penalty.

No states have done so since it became legal nationwide. All of the bans on the death penalty date to before the Supreme Court first ruled against the death penalty. In that sense, New Jersey might be considered first because it is reviving the debate.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 10:23:56 AM »

If anything, this should be a vote of the people, not the legislature

Why is that, because then it'd have a better chance of not getting abolished? Tongue

No - I think if the people voted, it WOULD have a better chance of getting abolished - but it's still the people's right to choose something like this IMO - even if the people disagree with me.

What makes this issue different from any other?  The entire purpose we elect government representatives is to make decisions.  If every single big decision was put to the people, having a government would be rather pointless.

What Gabu said. Personally, I trust government over the people on social issues; people are much more likely to be swayed by mass hysteria (as we see, for example, in the violent calls for public vengeance in death penalty trials).
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2007, 02:12:56 AM »

What do you mean by this? Do you favor a statist approach when it comes to social policies? If so why do you have a negative social score?

However corruptable and self-serving politicians might be, I certainly trust them over the vast masses in terms of making policy decisions, as the politicians at least have defined stances on the issues rather than just flailing wildly depending on whatever was the last thing that they heard on the subject.

Again, Gabu is articulating the point well. The people don't really have positions, they just charge wildly from one decision to the next, usually without any attempt to be logical or consistent. Moreover, the public is easily swayed by demagogues.

That is not to say that I place a great deal of trust in politicians, many of whom are the demagogues themselves. But I do think they are more consistent and reasonable than the average idiot.

Shoot me, I'm a Platonic.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2007, 01:24:40 AM »

I would like to take a moment to applaud my usually incompetent state legislature.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2007, 12:44:02 PM »

It's a sad day for NJ.  Although, I do agree w/ the guy who got the DP put back in NJ.  Having the DP gave victims' families a false sense of hope, since NJ normally didn't even get to actually executing anybody on death row.

Hope? Hope that they get their sick fantasies of vengeance fulfilled? I'd rather not give them that hope.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.