The Hill: Wilson pulls $110,000 at Cheney fundraiser
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:50:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Hill: Wilson pulls $110,000 at Cheney fundraiser
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Hill: Wilson pulls $110,000 at Cheney fundraiser  (Read 1274 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 16, 2007, 10:20:41 AM »

By Aaron Blake
November 16, 2007

Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.) was expected to raise about $110,000 for her Senate campaign Thursday night at a Washington fundraiser with Vice President Dick Cheney, according to a source close to Wilson.

Wilson is one of four major candidates in the race to replace Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.). She faces a primary with Rep. Steve Pearce, while Rep. Tom Udall and Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chavez are running on the Democratic side.

Wilson’s fundraiser, held at the Capitol Hill Club, was set to raise about half of the $110,000 from political action committees and half from personal contributions.

Wilson had about $750,000 cash in her campaign account at the end of September, which was more than Pearce ($580,000) but less than Udall ($800,000).

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/wilson-pulls-110000-at-cheney-fundraiser-2007-11-16.html
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2007, 03:58:51 AM »

Do these types of things come up often in campaign ads?  Because it seems to me that the last person you want to be seen with right now is Dick Cheney.  We're still a year away from the election but is raising funds with Cheney really a smart move in the long run?
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2007, 11:50:31 PM »

Do these types of things come up often in campaign ads?  Because it seems to me that the last person you want to be seen with right now is Dick Cheney.  We're still a year away from the election but is raising funds with Cheney really a smart move in the long run?

This could hurt Wilson in the long run.  While some controversial figures have held fundraisers  for candidates before, Cheney is extremely unpopular.  She could use the $$, but this makes it easier for the Udall campaign to link her to Cheney.  And being linked to Cheney is well something I don't even think Republicans from Wyoming want at this point.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2007, 11:56:38 PM »

Do these types of things come up often in campaign ads?  Because it seems to me that the last person you want to be seen with right now is Dick Cheney.  We're still a year away from the election but is raising funds with Cheney really a smart move in the long run?

This could hurt Wilson in the long run.  While some controversial figures have held fundraisers  for candidates before, Cheney is extremely unpopular.  She could use the $$, but this makes it easier for the Udall campaign to link her to Cheney.  And being linked to Cheney is well something I don't even think Republicans from Wyoming want at this point.

Wilson is, however, unlikely to win the GOP primary, IMO. She faces the huge problem that there are far more Republicans in Pearce's district than in her own, and that is only compounded by the fact that she has recently been embroiled in a scandal. It wasn't a career-ending scandal, but it destroyed any argument that she might make that she is "more electable" than Pearce.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2007, 07:23:14 PM »

She faces the huge problem that there are far more Republicans in Pearce's district than in her own, and that is only compounded by the fact that she has recently been embroiled in a scandal.

Registration by district:

NM-1: D 46%, R 35%, DTS 16%
NM-2: D 48%, R 36%, DTS 15%
NM-3: D 54%, R 29%, DTS 14%
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2007, 09:26:44 PM »

She faces the huge problem that there are far more Republicans in Pearce's district than in her own, and that is only compounded by the fact that she has recently been embroiled in a scandal.

Registration by district:

NM-1: D 46%, R 35%, DTS 16%
NM-2: D 48%, R 36%, DTS 15%
NM-3: D 54%, R 29%, DTS 14%

Is New Mexico a close primary system? Because, if not, my point still stands (as Bush voters instead of Republicans).

Those numbers do come as a surprise, though I was vaguely aware that Democrats had an overwhelming registration advantage in NM.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2007, 10:03:45 PM »

Usually in NM primary elections, Republican turnout in NM-01 tends to be higher in NM-02, such that the % of actual Republican primary voters statewide from NM-01 tends to be around 40%.  Just FYI.

Independents cannot vote in primaries in NM.

Wilson is probably the slight favorite in the primary - though New Mexico elections tend to be strange, so be prepared.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.