is udall too liberal to win statewide in colorado?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:58:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  is udall too liberal to win statewide in colorado?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: is udall too liberal to win statewide in colorado?  (Read 1879 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 18, 2007, 09:47:15 PM »

personally i like him.  i like the whole udall family.

but i think this race might be a lot closer than a lot of the dems expect.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2007, 09:51:33 PM »

is Brown too liberal to win statewide in Ohio?
is Tester too liberal to win statewide in Montana?
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2007, 09:55:57 PM »

is Brown too liberal to win statewide in Ohio?
is Tester too liberal to win statewide in Montana?

yes.  as you will find out in 2012.

just like grams was too conservative to win in mn, but the tidal wave of 94 washed him in.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2007, 10:00:39 PM »

the relevant point is that you used those claims in 2006, in reference to 2006.  I'm assuming this thread is about 2008, and not 2014.  correct me if I am wrong.

and I'll also remind you, that projection of the future is not an argument.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,937


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2007, 10:04:58 PM »

Udall's a good fit for New Mexico, just like Tester, Brown and Webb were/are good fits for Montana, Ohio and Virginia.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2007, 10:06:00 PM »

the relevant point is that you used those claims in 2006, in reference to 2006.  I'm assuming this thread is about 2008, and not 2014.  correct me if I am wrong.

and I'll also remind you, that projection of the future is not an argument.

are you expecting 08 to be as democrat of a year as 06?

possible.  but probably not.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2007, 10:08:09 PM »

the relevant point is that you used those claims in 2006, in reference to 2006.  I'm assuming this thread is about 2008, and not 2014.  correct me if I am wrong.

and I'll also remind you, that projection of the future is not an argument.

are you expecting 08 to be as democrat of a year as 06?

possible.  but probably not.

yes, if not moreso.  Dems have exhausted most of the HOR possibilities so likely will only make marginal gains there but I consider a similar senate swing and a presidential victory to be very likely.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2007, 10:12:42 PM »

the relevant point is that you used those claims in 2006, in reference to 2006.  I'm assuming this thread is about 2008, and not 2014.  correct me if I am wrong.

and I'll also remind you, that projection of the future is not an argument.

are you expecting 08 to be as democrat of a year as 06?

possible.  but probably not.

yes, if not moreso.  Dems have exhausted most of the HOR possibilities so likely will only make marginal gains there but I consider a similar senate swing and a presidential victory to be very likely.

well ill agree that if 08 is as democrat as 06, udalll will win.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2007, 10:23:13 PM »

Here we go again.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2007, 10:28:06 PM »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2007, 10:31:30 PM »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.

today=2007
hey, look, i think udall has an edge in the race, and i think the democrat nominee for president will likely win colorado.

i just wanted to stimulate some discussion.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2007, 10:38:52 PM »
« Edited: November 18, 2007, 10:40:33 PM by meekermariner »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.

today=2007

Exact same argument used this time in 2005. We all know how that one turned out.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm not mad at you for bringing it up, I was just stating my opinion.

I think it'll probably end up about 53% - 46% Udall. Possibly more than that.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2007, 12:01:46 AM »

No, and if any question should be asked, it should be is Schaffer to conservative to win statewide in Colorado?

The Democratic trend in Colorado is being led by the Denver suburbs an area where Udall will win.  The outer suburbs to exurban areas such a Douglas County remain strongly GOP, but the inner suburbs specifically Jefferson & Araphoe counties were once GOP strongholds, they aren't anymore, and it costs the GOP  The area would vote for a liberal Democrat over a conservative Republican.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2007, 12:22:31 AM »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.

The fact that Democrats haven't done a thing to justify being given continued control other than the fact that they're not Republicans?  That's a new twist.  Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2007, 12:26:07 AM »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.

The fact that Democrats haven't done a thing to justify being given continued control other than the fact that they're not Republicans?  That's a new twist.  Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's.

So the logical thing for people to do is go back to the ones they just chucked out of office? America may be pissed at the Democrats, but they hate the Republicans even more. And polling backs that up.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2007, 12:43:21 AM »

In 2001 & 2002 The League of Conservation Voters gave Bob Schaffer a rating of 0%.

Mark Udall received 100%.

Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2007, 01:10:19 AM »

Given that the Colorado GOP will probably nominate a staunch right-winger, Udall will probably win.

As an aside, I remember noticing years ago that Udall considered himself a 'non-practicing Mormon'. I was wondering if his lack of religion will hurt him.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2007, 01:49:25 AM »

Given that the Colorado GOP will probably nominate a staunch right-winger, Udall will probably win.

As an aside, I remember noticing years ago that Udall considered himself a 'non-practicing Mormon'. I was wondering if his lack of religion will hurt him.

How many people in Colorado are Mormons (very tempted to say morons), percentage wise?

Because if its a small percentage, Udall might be in a catch 22 as religion goes...
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2007, 02:21:33 AM »

Why wouldn't 2008 be as Democratic as 2006? The things that caused the 2006 victory (anger at the GOP and anger over Iraq) are still just as present today.

The fact that Democrats haven't done a thing to justify being given continued control other than the fact that they're not Republicans?  That's a new twist.  Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's.

Yet Democrats continue to lead by wide margins in the nationwide Congressional ballot and they also enjoy much higher approval ratings when people are asked separately about Congressional Democrats and Congressional Republicans.

Congressional approval ratings by themselves are highly deceiving in that most people rate Congress based on how much the opposing party is annoying the party they favor.  Right now, Republicans are being highly obstructionist so Democratic voters have a negative view of Congress.  At the same time, Democrats are pushing an agenda that the Republicans dislike so Republican voters are pissed as well.  Thus, you end up with a very low approval rating that doesn't really mean very much.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2007, 04:54:38 AM »

In 2001 & 2002 The League of Conservation Voters gave Bob Schaffer a rating of 0%.

Mark Udall received 100%.

One will win anyway.  Slight Udall.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2007, 10:51:28 AM »

is Brown too liberal to win statewide in Ohio?
is Tester too liberal to win statewide in Montana?

yes.  as you will find out in 2012.

Brown is a good fit for Ohio, and Ohio is moving more and more towards Brown every year.  He shouldn't have any trouble staying in the Senate for as long as he wants.  Obviously you have an excellent point about Tester and Montana, however - could go either way.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2007, 11:12:48 AM »

is Brown too liberal to win statewide in Ohio?
is Tester too liberal to win statewide in Montana?

yes.  as you will find out in 2012.

Brown is a good fit for Ohio, and Ohio is moving more and more towards Brown every year.  He shouldn't have any trouble staying in the Senate for as long as he wants.  Obviously you have an excellent point about Tester and Montana, however - could go either way.

I thought that Brown may have said somewhere that he wasn't going to run for re-election in 2012?  I know these things are subject to change but still...
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2007, 01:00:15 PM »

No, I don't consider Udall is too liberal to win statewide. What does seem to be happening is that, statewide, Colorado is clearly in no mood to elect right-wing whackadoos nowadays Smiley

Dave
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2007, 04:35:05 PM »

is udall too liberal to win statewide in colorado?

No
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2007, 05:00:26 PM »

I still feel many people in CO do not want 3 Democrats as their top statewide officials, which could cause some defection.  Also, the 2 Dems they elected recently, Ritter and Salazar, are some of the most conservative Dems.  I think Schaffer surprises a lot of people and wins this race.  As for NM, that's another story I won't address until after the primary.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.