Should members of the Church of Peyote be allowed to consume mescaline? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:13:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should members of the Church of Peyote be allowed to consume mescaline? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should members of the Church of Peyote be allowed to consume mescaline?
#1
Anyone should be allowed to
 
#2
Only members of the Church
 
#3
No; mescaline should be completely illegal
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Should members of the Church of Peyote be allowed to consume mescaline?  (Read 12709 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« on: December 05, 2007, 12:47:40 AM »

Why?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2007, 10:06:36 AM »

Neither are cars, twinkies, tall buildings, beer, air travel or peanut butter.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2007, 03:04:40 PM »

The Twinkie benifits mankind more than mescaline does?  Are you aware of any religons that use the Twinkie as a major aspect of their faith?

But even if there is no good reason to use a substance you can grow in your backyard, why should the govt have any say in whether an adult uses said substance or not?  Maybe Liberty means something different to me.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 01:07:45 AM »


Mescaline is not physically addictive.  Why do you support having it illegal while alcohol is not illegal?  Beyond the extent to which the effects go, there isn't a lot of difference.

No response yet, I see.

It still effects your judgement way more than alcohol does.  And you can have a glass of wine and not be drunk/still be fully funcitonal.
So your for the legalization of pot then?  You can smoke as much pot as you want and still drive better than somebody with a 6 pack in them.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2007, 12:09:46 PM »


It still effects your judgement way more than alcohol does.  And you can have a glass of wine and not be drunk/still be fully funcitonal.
So your for the legalization of pot then?  You can smoke as much pot as you want and still drive better than somebody with a 6 pack in them.

You're missing my point.  People don't just smoke enough so that they aren't effected.  You shouldn't drive drunk or even get drunk for that matter - and if you DO drink and endanger somebody, you should be punished - but if you're home alone and do whatever, I really don't care.  But smoking pot is a lot different than having a bear or a glass of wine.
So mescaline is bad because it, according to you, effects your judgement more than alcohol.  But pot is bad because it's different than beer or wine.  You don't care if people drink a case of Bud Lights a day as long as it's in their own home.  But if a guy wants to smoke a joint when he gets home from work to relax, in his own home, it's bad....because it's different.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2007, 01:28:03 AM »

No more or less so than your average drinker.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,355
United States


« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2007, 05:47:26 AM »

I was in my early 20's before I switched over.  Be careful though.  First you stop hating on pot, then prostitution, then all victimless crimes, then your against the Department of Education and the Patriot Act....next thing you know you're sending Ron Paul $100. Grin
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.