2008: Paul v/s Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:04:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  2008: Paul v/s Clinton
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2008: Paul v/s Clinton  (Read 1273 times)
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 02, 2007, 12:43:45 AM »

Who would win if the race was between Ron Paul and Hillary Clinton in 2008?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2007, 01:00:20 AM »

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2007, 08:36:24 AM »

Clinton landslide.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2007, 03:05:09 PM »

I would give Oklahoma and Nebraska to Clinton while adding Mississippi for Paul.

Otherwise that looks right, Clinton would probably win by areound 15-20% nationally
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2007, 03:10:51 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:



Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2007, 03:50:27 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:





No way Paul takes CA.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2007, 03:54:32 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:





No way Paul takes CA.
I think he wins a lot of the ultra-liberal vote in areas like San Francisco, taking something like 30% in San Francisco.  Hillary's high disapprovals allow him to seek a huge upset here.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2007, 06:21:40 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:





No way Paul takes CA.
I think he wins a lot of the ultra-liberal vote in areas like San Francisco, taking something like 30% in San Francisco.  Hillary's high disapprovals allow him to seek a huge upset here.
No way. Some latte liberals might vote for Paul but only 5% of them. CA stays Democratic by just as much as 2004.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2007, 12:27:20 AM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:





No way Paul takes CA.
I think he wins a lot of the ultra-liberal vote in areas like San Francisco, taking something like 30% in San Francisco.  Hillary's high disapprovals allow him to seek a huge upset here.
No way. Some latte liberals might vote for Paul but only 5% of them. CA stays Democratic by just as much as 2004.

I think CA swings Republican by about 2 or 3%, but not enough for Paul to take it.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 03, 2007, 12:37:02 AM »

There would be a third-party splinter. No way the coporatists, neocons and conservatives in the party would allow it to just be Paul.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.221 seconds with 12 queries.