Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2013, 07:18:50 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  International Elections (Moderator: Sibboleth)
| | |-+  Weimar Election Maps
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print
Author Topic: Weimar Election Maps  (Read 11227 times)
bullmoose88
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14286


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2007, 08:02:17 pm »
Ignore

Well...I just talked with the cats...yes the cats...and they'd like some smoother fonts.

:-p
Logged

A Socially Liberal, Fiscally Conservative NE Republican with some Left-Libertarian/3rd Way Leanings. Simply, a Rockefeller Republican.

According to one poster, I represent a...

Dying bread of Americans.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17521
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: December 08, 2007, 12:07:31 am »
Ignore

I have been wondering who "Abolf Sitler" is Wink Any relation to Toronto Maple Leafs great Darryl Sittler?

You're silly; it's quite clearly "Ubolf Sitler".

Ah yes. My bad.
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56721
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 08, 2007, 04:39:10 am »
Ignore

What electoral system did the Weimar Republic actually use?

Proportional representation w/ no thresholds IIRC


That's correct. Pure PR. No thresholds or direct seats. At least in Reichstag elections.
That's not quite right. There were regional level constituencies with a threshold of 60,000 votes, and seats won there were upped at a national level to proportionality, but parties could at maximum only double their regional tally there. So it wasn't quite proportional for smaller parties.


President: Popular election. If no candidate received more than 50%, a run-off was held with a simple plurality of votes being sufficient now.

Interestingly, candidates could be replaced between the two rounds. As a result, the candidates in the run-off weren't always the same candidates which had stood in the first round. In addition, all candidates from the first round could theoretically participate in the run-off too. So, no candidates were actually eliminated with the first round (except for those who chose to drop out or who where replaced by their respective parties).



Example - 1925 presidential election

First round
Karl Jarres (DVP, also endorsed by DNVP): 38.8%
Otto Braun (SPD): 29.0%
Wilhelm Marx (Zentrum): 14.5%
Ernst Thälmann (KPD): 7.0%
Willy Hellpach (DDP): 5.8%
Heinrich Held (BVP): 3.7%
Erich Ludendorff (NSDAP): 1.1%

Second round
Paul von Hindenburg (endorsed by DVP, DNVP, BVP and NSDAP): 48.3%
Wilhelm Marx (Zentrum, also endorsed by SPD and DDP): 45.3%
Ernst Thälmann (KPD): 6.4%
[/quote]
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: December 08, 2007, 04:45:33 am »

Weren't seats given out on the basis of actual votes, rather than percentages? (might be mis-remembering there o/c)
Logged

Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5042


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 08, 2007, 06:15:03 am »
Ignore

That's not quite right. There were regional level constituencies with a threshold of 60,000 votes, and seats won there were upped at a national level to proportionality, but parties could at maximum only double their regional tally there. So it wasn't quite proportional for smaller parties.

D'Oh! I thought I had it all covered. Wink
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56721
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: December 08, 2007, 04:46:04 pm »
Ignore

Weren't seats given out on the basis of actual votes, rather than percentages? (might be mis-remembering there o/c)
Yes, that is correct.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56721
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2007, 04:48:22 pm »
Ignore

That's Saxony where Hitler won in 1932, isn't it? Aren't the NPD strong there today?

No, that isn't Saxony. The brown areas on the 1932 map are Brandenburg, Thuringia, Pomerania and  Schleswig-Holstein.

Saxony was considered a stronghold of the SPD and the communists during the Weimar Republic.
Saxony State was never much of a Communist stronghold. THough Saxony Province (modern Sachsen-Anhalt, very approximately) was. As was Thuringia.
Saxony was of course an SPD stronghold, but not as strongly so in the Weimar time as it was during the Prussian occupation of Germany ("Reich").
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
London Man
Silent Hunter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5637
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #32 on: December 08, 2007, 05:02:23 pm »
Ignore

Here's a map of the states of Weimar Germany:

http://www.thomasgraz.net/glass/map-D-1920.htm
Logged

Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4610
Sri Lanka


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #33 on: December 09, 2007, 04:05:08 am »
Ignore

While I'm grateful for the maps being posted, I'm having trouble reading the words, especially the party names.

Did Catholics vote overwhelmingly for Zentrum, or did they split their vote?


Logged


I actually do miss Howard, yeah.
That is one of the more nauseating things I have had to read today.
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5042


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: December 09, 2007, 05:30:39 am »
Ignore

Saxony State was never much of a Communist stronghold. THough Saxony Province (modern Sachsen-Anhalt, very approximately) was. As was Thuringia.

The differences between these entities were often marginal, however. In Reichstag elections, the KPD's share of vote tended to be a bit higher (between 0.5 and 3.0 percent) in the province of Saxony than in the state of Saxony.

However, the KPD always received higher percentages in the state of Saxony than they did nation-wide. So, the KPD was stronger in the province of Saxony than in the state of Saxony, but also stronger in the state of Saxony than in Germany as a whole.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2007, 05:32:55 am by Frank Force »Logged
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5042


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: December 09, 2007, 05:38:46 am »
Ignore

Did Catholics vote overwhelmingly for Zentrum, or did they split their vote?

Ah, there is this standard reference work about voters in the Weimar Republic by Prof. Jürgen Falter... I will try to piece together what I think to remember from that. Cheesy

SPD - Working class
KPD - Also workers as well as a big chunk of unemployment people during the depression
Zentrum - Catholics (independent of class)
DDP/DVP/DNVP - protestant middle/upper class
NSDAP - also mostly protestant middle class

Of course this is extremely generalized here. There were some Catholics who voted SPD or workers who voted NSDAP, they simply did it less frequently.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2007, 05:43:04 am by Frank Force »Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #36 on: December 09, 2007, 05:39:55 am »



% vote NSDAP 1924-1932. Note that in 1924 they had deals and so on with other far-right parties. One of which polled something like 20% in Mecklenburg. The sort of scale used here is a bit different to the sort which will be used for other parties.

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Logged

PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30339
South Africa


View Profile WWW
« Reply #37 on: December 09, 2007, 07:23:45 am »
Ignore

I'd be interested in a 1933 election map Al
Logged





Vote Xahar/Hashemite
For Mustafinism-Komovism
Against Misogyny
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56721
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: December 09, 2007, 04:28:22 pm »
Ignore

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Good question. Anything to do with Brüning not being in office anymore (ie, a Brüning personal vote depressing the July 32 Nazi vote in the South - perhaps vs a DNVP boost in their strongholds for Papen?) I also note that the July vote was less than two weeks after the Preußenputsch. Maybe the Nazis benefitted from that in the short run?
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #39 on: December 10, 2007, 06:58:54 pm »



DDP
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #40 on: December 11, 2007, 11:36:24 am »

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Good question. Anything to do with Brüning not being in office anymore (ie, a Brüning personal vote depressing the July 32 Nazi vote in the South - perhaps vs a DNVP boost in their strongholds for Papen?) I also note that the July vote was less than two weeks after the Preußenputsch. Maybe the Nazis benefitted from that in the short run?

A mix of those things might make sense. Where was Brüning based, btw?
Logged

Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56721
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: December 11, 2007, 11:40:51 am »
Ignore

Westphalia (which doesn't, of course, fit the theory.)
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30339
South Africa


View Profile WWW
« Reply #42 on: December 11, 2007, 04:23:52 pm »
Ignore

I'd be interested in a 1933 election map Al
Logged





Vote Xahar/Hashemite
For Mustafinism-Komovism
Against Misogyny
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #43 on: December 11, 2007, 04:31:55 pm »


Maps of that election will be made (maybe fairly soon). 1933 hasn't been included with the main series of maps because the election wasn't free and, as such, isn't strictly comparable to the main set of elections.
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #44 on: December 17, 2007, 07:22:03 pm »



DVP. Note for the DDP in 1930 applies here also.
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #45 on: January 06, 2008, 06:32:20 pm »



DNVP. Some very odd patterns there...
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2008, 07:36:09 am »



Zentrum (and BVP). Very stable pattern, as you'd expect, but the erosion of the party's vote in what is now (more or less) NRW shows up fairly well.

Should be added that the reactionary and particularist BVP was politically quite different from Zentrum.
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #47 on: January 19, 2008, 10:41:14 am »

Not very well at the moment so I'm making maps.



Anyways, the USPD was the left-wing minority faction that emerged out of the split in the SPD in 1915/1916. The party was only significant in two elections; 1919 and 1920. Can't show 1919 right now for one or two reasons. The party split at the end of 1920 with the majority faction (in terms of members but not in terms of deputies) becoming part of the KPD and the minority faction ('' '') eventually, returning to the SPD. A tiny minority didn't join either party but were never electorally significant.
Logged

Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37013
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: January 19, 2008, 12:36:46 pm »
Ignore

Not very well at the moment so I'm making maps.



Anyways, the USPD was the left-wing minority faction that emerged out of the split in the SPD in 1915/1916. The party was only significant in two elections; 1919 and 1920. Can't show 1919 right now for one or two reasons. The party split at the end of 1920 with the majority faction (in terms of members but not in terms of deputies) becoming part of the KPD and the minority faction ('' '') eventually, returning to the SPD. A tiny minority didn't join either party but were never electorally significant.

IIRC, the "U" stands for Unabhängige, which is a weird word.

These results clearly aren't by Land. What are they by?
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #49 on: January 19, 2008, 12:46:44 pm »

These results clearly aren't by Land. What are they by?

Oh but they are. Except in Prussia where they are by province.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory