Weimar Election Maps
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:48:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Weimar Election Maps
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Weimar Election Maps  (Read 23521 times)
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2007, 08:02:17 PM »

Well...I just talked with the cats...yes the cats...and they'd like some smoother fonts.

:-p
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 08, 2007, 12:07:31 AM »

I have been wondering who "Abolf Sitler" is Wink Any relation to Toronto Maple Leafs great Darryl Sittler?

You're silly; it's quite clearly "Ubolf Sitler".

Ah yes. My bad.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 08, 2007, 04:39:10 AM »

What electoral system did the Weimar Republic actually use?

Proportional representation w/ no thresholds IIRC


That's correct. Pure PR. No thresholds or direct seats. At least in Reichstag elections.
That's not quite right. There were regional level constituencies with a threshold of 60,000 votes, and seats won there were upped at a national level to proportionality, but parties could at maximum only double their regional tally there. So it wasn't quite proportional for smaller parties.


President: Popular election. If no candidate received more than 50%, a run-off was held with a simple plurality of votes being sufficient now.

Interestingly, candidates could be replaced between the two rounds. As a result, the candidates in the run-off weren't always the same candidates which had stood in the first round. In addition, all candidates from the first round could theoretically participate in the run-off too. So, no candidates were actually eliminated with the first round (except for those who chose to drop out or who where replaced by their respective parties).



Example - 1925 presidential election

First round
Karl Jarres (DVP, also endorsed by DNVP): 38.8%
Otto Braun (SPD): 29.0%
Wilhelm Marx (Zentrum): 14.5%
Ernst Thälmann (KPD): 7.0%
Willy Hellpach (DDP): 5.8%
Heinrich Held (BVP): 3.7%
Erich Ludendorff (NSDAP): 1.1%

Second round
Paul von Hindenburg (endorsed by DVP, DNVP, BVP and NSDAP): 48.3%
Wilhelm Marx (Zentrum, also endorsed by SPD and DDP): 45.3%
Ernst Thälmann (KPD): 6.4%
[/quote]
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 08, 2007, 04:45:33 AM »

Weren't seats given out on the basis of actual votes, rather than percentages? (might be mis-remembering there o/c)
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,219
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 08, 2007, 06:15:03 AM »

That's not quite right. There were regional level constituencies with a threshold of 60,000 votes, and seats won there were upped at a national level to proportionality, but parties could at maximum only double their regional tally there. So it wasn't quite proportional for smaller parties.

D'Oh! I thought I had it all covered. Wink
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 08, 2007, 04:46:04 PM »

Weren't seats given out on the basis of actual votes, rather than percentages? (might be mis-remembering there o/c)
Yes, that is correct.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2007, 04:48:22 PM »

That's Saxony where Hitler won in 1932, isn't it? Aren't the NPD strong there today?

No, that isn't Saxony. The brown areas on the 1932 map are Brandenburg, Thuringia, Pomerania and  Schleswig-Holstein.

Saxony was considered a stronghold of the SPD and the communists during the Weimar Republic.
Saxony State was never much of a Communist stronghold. THough Saxony Province (modern Sachsen-Anhalt, very approximately) was. As was Thuringia.
Saxony was of course an SPD stronghold, but not as strongly so in the Weimar time as it was during the Prussian occupation of Germany ("Reich").
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 08, 2007, 05:02:23 PM »

Here's a map of the states of Weimar Germany:

http://www.thomasgraz.net/glass/map-D-1920.htm
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 09, 2007, 04:05:08 AM »

While I'm grateful for the maps being posted, I'm having trouble reading the words, especially the party names.

Did Catholics vote overwhelmingly for Zentrum, or did they split their vote?


Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,219
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 09, 2007, 05:30:39 AM »
« Edited: December 09, 2007, 05:32:55 AM by Frank Force »

Saxony State was never much of a Communist stronghold. THough Saxony Province (modern Sachsen-Anhalt, very approximately) was. As was Thuringia.

The differences between these entities were often marginal, however. In Reichstag elections, the KPD's share of vote tended to be a bit higher (between 0.5 and 3.0 percent) in the province of Saxony than in the state of Saxony.

However, the KPD always received higher percentages in the state of Saxony than they did nation-wide. So, the KPD was stronger in the province of Saxony than in the state of Saxony, but also stronger in the state of Saxony than in Germany as a whole.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,219
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 09, 2007, 05:38:46 AM »
« Edited: December 09, 2007, 05:43:04 AM by Frank Force »

Did Catholics vote overwhelmingly for Zentrum, or did they split their vote?

Ah, there is this standard reference work about voters in the Weimar Republic by Prof. Jürgen Falter... I will try to piece together what I think to remember from that. Cheesy

SPD - Working class
KPD - Also workers as well as a big chunk of unemployment people during the depression
Zentrum - Catholics (independent of class)
DDP/DVP/DNVP - protestant middle/upper class
NSDAP - also mostly protestant middle class

Of course this is extremely generalized here. There were some Catholics who voted SPD or workers who voted NSDAP, they simply did it less frequently.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 09, 2007, 05:39:55 AM »



% vote NSDAP 1924-1932. Note that in 1924 they had deals and so on with other far-right parties. One of which polled something like 20% in Mecklenburg. The sort of scale used here is a bit different to the sort which will be used for other parties.

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 09, 2007, 07:23:45 AM »

I'd be interested in a 1933 election map Al
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 09, 2007, 04:28:22 PM »

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Good question. Anything to do with Brüning not being in office anymore (ie, a Brüning personal vote depressing the July 32 Nazi vote in the South - perhaps vs a DNVP boost in their strongholds for Papen?) I also note that the July vote was less than two weeks after the Preußenputsch. Maybe the Nazis benefitted from that in the short run?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 10, 2007, 06:58:54 PM »



DDP
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 11, 2007, 11:36:24 AM »

One thing I'll note here that I've never really spotted before; the second '32 election, the Nazi vote held up better in southern Germany than elsewhere. Anyone know why?
Good question. Anything to do with Brüning not being in office anymore (ie, a Brüning personal vote depressing the July 32 Nazi vote in the South - perhaps vs a DNVP boost in their strongholds for Papen?) I also note that the July vote was less than two weeks after the Preußenputsch. Maybe the Nazis benefitted from that in the short run?

A mix of those things might make sense. Where was Brüning based, btw?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: December 11, 2007, 11:40:51 AM »

Westphalia (which doesn't, of course, fit the theory.)
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: December 11, 2007, 04:23:52 PM »

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: December 11, 2007, 04:31:55 PM »


Maps of that election will be made (maybe fairly soon). 1933 hasn't been included with the main series of maps because the election wasn't free and, as such, isn't strictly comparable to the main set of elections.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: December 17, 2007, 07:22:03 PM »



DVP. Note for the DDP in 1930 applies here also.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: January 06, 2008, 06:32:20 PM »



DNVP. Some very odd patterns there...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2008, 07:36:09 AM »



Zentrum (and BVP). Very stable pattern, as you'd expect, but the erosion of the party's vote in what is now (more or less) NRW shows up fairly well.

Should be added that the reactionary and particularist BVP was politically quite different from Zentrum.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: January 19, 2008, 10:41:14 AM »

Not very well at the moment so I'm making maps.



Anyways, the USPD was the left-wing minority faction that emerged out of the split in the SPD in 1915/1916. The party was only significant in two elections; 1919 and 1920. Can't show 1919 right now for one or two reasons. The party split at the end of 1920 with the majority faction (in terms of members but not in terms of deputies) becoming part of the KPD and the minority faction ('' '') eventually, returning to the SPD. A tiny minority didn't join either party but were never electorally significant.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: January 19, 2008, 12:36:46 PM »

Not very well at the moment so I'm making maps.



Anyways, the USPD was the left-wing minority faction that emerged out of the split in the SPD in 1915/1916. The party was only significant in two elections; 1919 and 1920. Can't show 1919 right now for one or two reasons. The party split at the end of 1920 with the majority faction (in terms of members but not in terms of deputies) becoming part of the KPD and the minority faction ('' '') eventually, returning to the SPD. A tiny minority didn't join either party but were never electorally significant.

IIRC, the "U" stands for Unabhängige, which is a weird word.

These results clearly aren't by Land. What are they by?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: January 19, 2008, 12:46:44 PM »

These results clearly aren't by Land. What are they by?

Oh but they are. Except in Prussia where they are by province.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 11 queries.