Clinton/Easely v. Huckabee/Romney
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:00:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Clinton/Easely v. Huckabee/Romney		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton/Easely v. Huckabee/Romney  (Read 1021 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 12, 2007, 07:00:07 PM »


Clinton/Easely: 51% PV, 297 EV
Huckabee/Romney: 48% PV, 241 EV
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2007, 07:10:28 PM »


Mike Huckabee: 49.8%, 270 EV
Hillary Clinton: 49.2%, 268 EV
Other: 1%, 0 EV
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2007, 07:13:06 PM »
Quote from: Lief on December 12, 2007, 07:10:28 PM


Mike Huckabee: 49.8%, 270 EV
Hillary Clinton: 49.2%, 268 EV
Other: 1%, 0 EV

I find it very hard to believe that a Republican like Huckabee will win Wisconsin in 2008, because of the war.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 07:17:44 PM »
Quote from: Lief on December 12, 2007, 07:10:28 PM


Mike Huckabee: 49.8%, 270 EV
Hillary Clinton: 49.2%, 268 EV
Other: 1%, 0 EV

If Huckabee is at the top of the ticket, AR will go Republican
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2007, 07:22:43 PM »
Quote from: auburntiger on December 12, 2007, 07:17:44 PM
Quote from: Lief on December 12, 2007, 07:10:28 PM


Mike Huckabee: 49.8%, 270 EV
Hillary Clinton: 49.2%, 268 EV
Other: 1%, 0 EV

If Huckabee is at the top of the ticket, AR will go Republican

I agree with AR.

Also, I can not see Wisconsin going Republican unless Ohio does first.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2007, 07:28:48 PM »
Quote from: Lief on December 12, 2007, 07:10:28 PM


Mike Huckabee: 49.8%, 270 EV
Hillary Clinton: 49.2%, 268 EV
Other: 1%, 0 EV
LOL at Huckabee losing Arkansas (his homestate) to Hillary
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM »
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM »
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2007, 09:34:42 PM »
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?

Easely is a lot more popular than Edwards was.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2007, 09:35:49 PM »
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 09:34:42 PM
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?

Easely is a lot more popular than Edwards was.
You obviously have not been paying attention to NC or the impact of VPs on recent elections.  Although I have never seen you say anything anti-Dem
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2007, 07:53:26 PM »
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:35:49 PM
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 09:34:42 PM
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?

Easely is a lot more popular than Edwards was.
You obviously have not been paying attention to NC or the impact of VPs on recent elections.  Although I have never seen you say anything anti-Dem

Easely is way more popular and likeable then Edwards. Easely would swing NC even if he was the VP.  Also downwithdaleft do you know anything about NC and the people that live in NC? No you don't so shut the f**K up and leave me alone jacka$$.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2007, 08:02:41 PM »
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:35:49 PM
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 09:34:42 PM
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?

Easely is a lot more popular than Edwards was.
You obviously have not been paying attention to NC or the impact of VPs on recent elections.  Although I have never seen you say anything anti-Dem
There is nothing to say that is Anti-Dem, unless you like the corrupt bastards who run the GOP.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2007, 01:49:29 PM »
There is no way Huck would pick Romney.  Huck knows that a baptist minister/mormon ticket is too much for America to swallow.

But a Huckabee/Paul ticket would be interesting!!!
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2007, 02:47:16 PM »
I am from nc and even I can say that easley won't secure the state for the dems. He kay make it closer than it would be without him, but in the end huckabee would win it.

But Edwards was hardly ever popular in NC. He wouldve lost his senate seat if he had run in 2004.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2007, 03:12:50 PM »
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 07:00:07 PM


Clinton/Easely: 51% PV, 297 EV
Huckabee/Romney: 48% PV, 241 EV

Honestly, why do you insist on giving the Democrats a great running mate, and fall flat when it comes to the Republican?
I know your a partisian hack, but honestly, if your going to make a scenario atleast make it fair for both sides.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2007, 04:36:50 PM »
Quote from: Josh22 on December 13, 2007, 07:53:26 PM
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:35:49 PM
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 09:34:42 PM
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on December 12, 2007, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Josh22 on December 12, 2007, 09:21:55 PM
Easely would swing NC, he is very popular.
Yes, just as Edwards did in 2004.  Do you listen to urself speak?

Easely is a lot more popular than Edwards was.
You obviously have not been paying attention to NC or the impact of VPs on recent elections.  Although I have never seen you say anything anti-Dem

Easely is way more popular and likeable then Edwards. Easely would swing NC even if he was the VP.  Also downwithdaleft do you know anything about NC and the people that live in NC? No you don't so shut the f**K up and leave me alone jacka$$.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2007, 04:36:50 PM »
Quote from: AndrewCT on December 14, 2007, 03:12:50 PM
Quote from: Warner for Senate '08 on December 12, 2007, 07:00:07 PM


Clinton/Easely: 51% PV, 297 EV
Huckabee/Romney: 48% PV, 241 EV

Honestly, why do you insist on giving the Democrats a great running mate, and fall flat when it comes to the Republican?
I know your a partisian hack, but honestly, if your going to make a scenario atleast make it fair for both sides.

Who would you suggest?
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2007, 07:27:40 PM »
How about Vermont Governor Jim Douglas, or Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell, to even out the ticket.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 13 queries.