1968-Reagan/Rhodes v. Humphrey/Smathers v. Wallace/LeMay (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:34:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1968-Reagan/Rhodes v. Humphrey/Smathers v. Wallace/LeMay (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1968-Reagan/Rhodes v. Humphrey/Smathers v. Wallace/LeMay  (Read 1446 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« on: December 15, 2007, 02:18:51 PM »

I see no reason why Humphrey would not win against Reagan in 1968. 

In 1968, the nation was not ready to embrace Reagan's particular brand of conservatism.

Reagan had only been elected Governor of California in 1966, and the nation would have gone for the much more politically experienced Humphrey for President.

Hubert Horatio Humphrey realizes his lifelong dream of becoming President of the United States.

Humphrey/Smathers                271
Reagan/Rhodes                       222
Wallace/LeMay                          45

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.