SC: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 1 in SC
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:51:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  SC: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 1 in SC
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 1 in SC  (Read 2252 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,474
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 15, 2007, 12:00:14 PM »

New Poll: South Carolina President by CNN/Time on 2007-12-12

Summary: D: 48%, R: 47%, U: 1%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2007, 12:15:04 PM »

Also included:

Huckabee 48%
Clinton 47%
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2007, 01:07:12 PM »

wow.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2007, 01:13:50 PM »

Outlier, right?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2007, 01:17:24 PM »

That is ... eh ... weird. Itīs also the first SC poll. letīs wait and see if Rasmussen etc. confirms it. Also, early NC polls showing a toss-up were later supported by Rasmussen.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2007, 02:35:02 PM »

I keep on saying we could see major electoral realignment in this cycle. Do not be too dependent on 2000 and 2004 results to base your predictions on.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2007, 04:08:18 PM »

Isn't CNN/Time one of the worse polls around? At least I seem to recall not trusting it all that much. But given what we've seen elsewhere Clinton could be close but most likely not this close.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2007, 05:30:39 PM »

Maybe it will be close, but the Dems won't win SC.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2007, 05:56:59 PM »

Maybe it will be close, but the Dems won't win SC.
I'd have to disagree with that.  A lot depends on the candidates.  The last few Democratic nominees have not been the sort that inspire South Carolina's Democrats or independents to vote for them.  If the Republicans pick Rudy, that'll negate a lot of the social conservative fervor for the GOP.  That said, if the Dems are competitive here, it'll be academic whether they actually win the state as they'll certainly have won the election.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,063


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2007, 09:58:59 PM »

how could hillary inspire SC's democrats? her husband couldn't even carry the state over Bob Dole. I cant see a Democrat winning this state even if Rudy is the nominee. He's got a lot of support in the Charleston area from what I've seen.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2007, 10:16:49 PM »

I keep on saying we could see major electoral realignment in this cycle. Do not be too dependent on 2000 and 2004 results to base your predictions on.

I completely agree. With Bush gone, a big sway of the country will become a lot more competitive. The Republican will not win the border states by the 15-20% margins of 2004.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2007, 10:48:26 PM »

how could hillary inspire SC's democrats? her husband couldn't even carry the state over Bob Dole. I cant see a Democrat winning this state even if Rudy is the nominee. He's got a lot of support in the Charleston area from what I've seen.

The question isn't how much the Democrat will inspire her/his party, its more about how much the Republican will inspire his party.  I recently read that SC has a lot of new transplants from New York which could be good or bad for Giuliani depending on how you look at it.  Clinton is leading Giuliani by wide margins in New York but do the transplants in SC feel the same?  I'd say that Republicans still have the edge here regardless of candidates but I would be surprised if their margin of victory is more than 10 points.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2007, 10:02:34 PM »

Honestly, I don't see how any Democratic candidate could topple this GOP stronghold. But then again, define a party "stronghold"
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2007, 08:27:50 AM »

I can see it happen, although surprising.  Blacks really hate Bush and may be more inclined to get out and vote. 

Now that he's not running? That seems a tad illogical, to be honest...
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2007, 09:27:21 PM »

I keep on saying we could see major electoral realignment in this cycle. Do not be too dependent on 2000 and 2004 results to base your predictions on.

True, but South Carolina is solidly GOP.  They haven't gone Dem since Carter in '76, and vote reliably GOP at the statewide level.  This poll is odd, and I doubt it will be remotely accurate in the GE.
Logged
wdecker1
Rookie
**
Posts: 58
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: 1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 25, 2007, 03:35:43 AM »

It is important to note that there are many black voters in South Carolina and the black community may be energized to vote based on their strong dislike of Bush and their fondness of the Clintons.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,063


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 25, 2007, 02:01:19 PM »

Clinton wont win in SC. She may get more than the 40% that Kerry got, but she will not beat the GOP.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 25, 2007, 02:40:13 PM »

Clinton wont win in SC. She may get more than the 40% that Kerry got, but she will not beat the GOP.

I would have to agree, SC is lean to strong Republican in 2008.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 15 queries.