Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 04:32:36 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  Ted Stevens v Mike Gravel
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Ted Stevens v Mike Gravel  (Read 1109 times)
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34280
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: December 30, 2007, 12:49:58 am »
Ignore

how would this turn out?
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
CultureKing
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3240
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2007, 01:41:14 am »
Ignore

Simple: Gravel would be crushed
Logged

Econ: -6.50, Social: -5.23
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49380


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2007, 01:44:58 am »
Ignore

Simple: Gravel would be crushed
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13927


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2007, 01:46:20 am »
Ignore

Stevens 65%, Gravel 35%. Maybe 60-40 if the DSCC gets involved.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6862


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2007, 09:27:41 am »
Ignore

If nothing else, the Battle of the Crazy Old Men would be the most entertaining Senate race in years.
Logged
Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29788
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: 0.35

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2007, 10:22:24 am »
Ignore

Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Know Your Rights!
ABAsite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1007
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -5.39

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2007, 03:33:53 pm »
Ignore

Stevens 65%, Gravel 35%. Maybe 60-40 if the DSCC gets involved.

I doubt they would.
Logged
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12181
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2007, 04:56:40 pm »
Ignore

Stevens 65%, Gravel 35%. Maybe 60-40 if the DSCC gets involved.

I love when people assume the DSCC to be the most stupid entity on the planet.
Logged

MarkWarner08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5861


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2007, 06:57:15 pm »
Ignore

Stevens 65%, Gravel 35%. Maybe 60-40 if the DSCC gets involved.

I love when people assume the DSCC to be the most stupid entity on the planet.
Mr. Moderate, what the heck happened to your avatar? Did you get into a tiff with Harry again?
re: the first statement. Yeah, everyone knows that's the NRSC.
Logged

Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6029
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2008, 01:21:32 am »
Ignore

Stevens 65%, Gravel 35%. Maybe 60-40 if the DSCC gets involved.

I doubt they would.

I doubt anyone under the age of 50 remembers who Gravel is.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory