Could RFK won Texas in 1968?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:25:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Could RFK won Texas in 1968?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Unsure
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Could RFK won Texas in 1968?  (Read 2059 times)
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 31, 2007, 07:53:23 AM »

We know that in 1968 Texas went to Hubert Humphrey after strong support from President Lyndon B. Johnson and Governor John Connally. Suppose RFK isn't assassinated and thus won the nomination in 1968, would he have been able to win Texas? Discuss.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2007, 09:14:27 AM »

first of all, i wouldnt assume that rfk would have gotten the nomination.

it  is possible he would have won texas, but not likely.  obviously lbj wouldnt have lifted a finger to help him.  im not sure about connally.  maybe connally had a bond with the kennedys since he was also shot in dallas in 63.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2007, 04:51:52 PM »

Yes, although Wallace would be a close second.
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2007, 05:25:07 PM »

No way.  HHH won barely over Nixon with huge help from LBJ.  That help would not have been there for RFK.  As far as Wallace being a close second, forget it.  The results were in 68 were:

HHH        41
Nixon      39
Wallace   19

Wallace would have been a distant third still.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2007, 09:17:14 PM »

I doubt it. The Solid South was fast eroding, and RFK was too darn liberal.
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2007, 11:00:29 PM »

John Connally HATED Ralph Yarborough.  Both were the clear leaders of the two Texas Democratic factions that fought tooth and nail for control of the party for years.  In fact, it was Connally's open support of Lloyd Bentson in the Democratic senatorial primary two years later that helped Bentson upset Yarborough.

Trust me, RFK would never have carried Texas and I believe Nixon would have taken Texas by a solid margin.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2007, 11:03:28 PM »

it is more likely that he would have finished third than it is that he would have won.  LBJ wouldn't have lifted a finger to help him.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2008, 12:08:30 AM »

Nixon would've won it.

But RFK would've had a better chance of winning Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, New Jersey and California than HHH.

And the idea that LBJ would privately endorse Nixon is absurd, LBJ hated Nixon. He may not have liked RFK, but he still would've supported him over Nixon.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2008, 02:04:50 AM »

I go with Nym here.

Kennedy probably would've lost Texas, but had a better shot at winning enough states to counter that loss.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2008, 03:37:10 AM »

I think Connally is probably the key.  He was the Governor, with a strong tie to JFK, by being in the limo.  A defection to Nixon would have swung Texas to Nixon.

He was willing to serve a Treasury Secretary under Nixon., so it's not impossible.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2008, 03:43:04 AM »

I wonder if RFK could've considered Connally as VP?

Just a thought.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2008, 02:09:49 PM »

In 1968, Nixon wins Texas and the Presidency over RFK.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 14 queries.