Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 23, 2014, 06:59:45 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
| | |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
| | | |-+  Has Bush just lost himself WV?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Has Bush just lost himself WV?  (Read 828 times)
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56200
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« on: August 09, 2004, 08:25:33 am »
Ignore

Bush to roll back Mining safety regulations
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27758
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2004, 10:07:55 am »
Ignore

Not neccessarily.  It all depends upon whether the miners of WV prefer the jobs that would be created by relaxing the regulations to the health they would would gain by keeping them.  In 2000, they seemed to prefer the promise of jobs due to less regulation that Bush favorred, but who knows now.  Unfortunately, high-sulfur Appalachian coal is at a competetive diasadvantage to low-sulfur coal, so because we want cleaner air (and rightfully so IMO) the Appalachian coal mines are slumping and this measure won''t affect the underlying problems that are causing mines there to close, but it will stimulate the mines in the short term.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56200
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2004, 11:42:36 am »
Ignore

Not neccessarily.  It all depends upon whether the miners of WV prefer the jobs that would be created by relaxing the regulations to the health they would would gain by keeping them.  In 2000, they seemed to prefer the promise of jobs due to less regulation that Bush favorred, but who knows now.  Unfortunately, high-sulfur Appalachian coal is at a competetive diasadvantage to low-sulfur coal, so because we want cleaner air (and rightfully so IMO) the Appalachian coal mines are slumping and this measure won''t affect the underlying problems that are causing mines there to close, but it will stimulate the mines in the short term.

There's a difference between enviromental regulation and safety regulation... people in mining communities generally don't like the former, but are (not suprisingly) in favour of latter...
This news moves WV from Kerry-S[light]F[avourite] to Kerry M[arginal], IMO.

As far as the future of the coal industry goes, I think that there should be attempts to increase the number of miners and mines, while decreasing the amount of coal being produced.
I also think that all Appalachian mines should be made into worker co-operatives (ala Tower Colliery in South Wales) and become community driven not profits driven.
Logged

bejkuy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 329


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2004, 12:56:52 pm »
Ignore

Hey AL,


As fellow individual from a coal mining town (#1 industry in Centralia, WA), I too have interest in such things.

You should read the this analysis from slate.

http:/.slate.com/id/2102496/entry/2102497/


Logged
bejkuy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 329


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2004, 12:58:08 pm »
Ignore

Sorry if the link doesn't work.  I'm lousy with computers.  If you do a google search under politics, slate, swingers you will come up with it.
Logged
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56200
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2004, 02:04:57 pm »
Ignore

Hey AL,


As fellow individual from a coal mining town (#1 industry in Centralia, WA), I too have interest in such things.

Centralia is a *very* unfortunate name for a coal town... Sad
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines