Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:30:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"?  (Read 1917 times)
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


« on: January 12, 2008, 11:18:52 AM »

People tend to talk about Obama like all he's ever done was run for senate, then run for president. The claim is that Barack Obama has too little experience in government, and that being a good speaker doesn't mean you have the ability to work within the frame of a real-life government to enact change. Though, isn't Illinois a state commonly known for its rough partisan politics? As such, wouldn't 8 years in its state senate have given Obama a good deal of experience in dealing with that sort of thing?

People tend to think of state legislatures as some kind of insignificant joke on the national stage, but it's not as if being a legislature affecting the lives of some 12 million people is a job that allows you to sit around all day and eat free lunches.

It's possible he didn't do much in the Illinois Senate, I don't know his record, but it seems like 8 years dealing with state politics should be counted as something.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.