Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:48:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is 8 years as a state senator not adequate "experience"?  (Read 1909 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
« on: January 12, 2008, 01:36:08 PM »
Quote from: Ivan Smirnov on January 12, 2008, 01:01:51 PM
Quote from: Josef Švejk on January 12, 2008, 01:00:05 PM
Quote from: Ivan Smirnov on January 12, 2008, 12:56:35 PM
OK, anything that has dramatically changed things?

Of course not. But then the same is true of the vast majority of Senators and Congresscritters.

So, the whole bunch remains awful. At least Johnson was Majority Leader.

Not the whole bunch, just a majority. There could 49 really great Senators, and they couldn't get anything good passed (even 50 really great Senators, with this VP).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.