SC PrimD: Mason-Dixon: Obama leads by 8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:07:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC PrimD: Mason-Dixon: Obama leads by 8
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC PrimD: Mason-Dixon: Obama leads by 8  (Read 1101 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 25, 2008, 01:32:53 AM »

New Poll: South Carolina President by Mason-Dixon on 2008-01-23

Summary:
Obama:
38%
Clinton:
30%
Edwards:
19%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
13%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details



Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2008, 10:00:32 AM »

IF the margin is 7-10% a 13% undecided is something to worry about. In both NV and NH Clinton did well with last minute deciders.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,071


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2008, 10:31:10 AM »

Not good for Barack. If he were to lose SC, his campaign is over.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2008, 12:45:16 AM »

Why doesn't Mason-Dixon know how to poll races with black candidates in them?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2008, 12:46:50 AM »

I just think everyone's turnout model was a little off.  blacks comprised about 8-10% more of the Dem primary electorate this year than in 2004.  That combined with a slightly better-than-expected showing for Edwards among whites killed the pre-election polls.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2008, 12:56:35 AM »

I just think everyone's turnout model was a little off.  blacks comprised about 8-10% more of the Dem primary electorate this year than in 2004.  That combined with a slightly better-than-expected showing for Edwards among whites killed the pre-election polls.

Just seems like a bit of a pattern with them. TN in '06, IA this year, etc.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2008, 01:01:25 AM »

As I said in another thread, the poll average for all the polls for SC(D) was off by just as much as (if not more than) the poll average for NH(D).  But in one case it underestimated Clinton, and in the other case it underestimated Obama.  So the polls are basically 0-2 in the Dem. primaries (as opposed to caucuses) this year.  Are the polls going to be this far off on Super Tuesday?  If so, I guess we really have no way of meaningfully tracking the race.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 15 queries.