Feb. 9th primaries & caucuses--Dem. results thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:10:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Feb. 9th primaries & caucuses--Dem. results thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18
Author Topic: Feb. 9th primaries & caucuses--Dem. results thread  (Read 18618 times)
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: February 10, 2008, 12:42:45 AM »

Texas is an open primary.  There will be some Republicans (along with some independents)who will cross over and vote for Obama if they think this will help put a fork in the Clintons.  Why not.  There's no race left on the GOP side.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: February 10, 2008, 12:45:01 AM »

The Obama Campaign just released a statement about fundraising, and how they are already getting close to 400,000 donars for the month of February. Also, that they obviously outpreformed the Clinton Campaign in fundraising in the month of January and February.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: February 10, 2008, 12:50:56 AM »

Oh, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch has endorsed Obama.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: February 10, 2008, 12:57:50 AM »

Oh, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch has endorsed Obama.

Well that's that then. Clinton should just drop out really. Game over, Obama wins.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: February 10, 2008, 12:58:48 AM »

Oh, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch has endorsed Obama.

Well that's that then. Clinton should just drop out really. Game over, Obama wins.

Sarcasm?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: February 10, 2008, 12:59:57 AM »

Oh, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch has endorsed Obama.

Well that's that then. Clinton should just drop out really. Game over, Obama wins.

Sarcasm?

That much should be obvious. Tongue
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: February 10, 2008, 01:00:04 AM »

Well that's that then. Clinton should just drop out really. Game over, Obama wins.

Nice one!
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: February 10, 2008, 01:01:30 AM »

Oh, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch has endorsed Obama.

Well that's that then. Clinton should just drop out really. Game over, Obama wins.

Sarcasm?

That much should be obvious. Tongue

Hm, I must be really out of the loop then. *researches*
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,474
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: February 10, 2008, 01:14:26 AM »

I was out all night. What did the initial exit polls show in LA?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: February 10, 2008, 01:15:57 AM »

Obama 52.6 to Clinton 44.8, so they under-estimated Obama's margin by like 12 points.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: February 10, 2008, 03:59:17 AM »

CNN.com only has the Washinton primary listed as being on Feb. 19. I thought there was a caucus today where delegates are actually being given. Am I wrong about this?
In regular primaries in Washington for statewide office, the ballots have both parties' candidates for nomination.  The voter indicates the party whose primary he wishes to participate in on the ballot.  Thus not only are his candidate choices secret, so is his party selection.

The national Democratic party does not like this, and has forced the Washington Democratic party to use caucuses to select their delegates.  The claim is that they are concerned about Republicans and Greens and Libertarians tainting their primary, but it is really more about being control freaks.  In addition, they want to be able to identify Democrat leaning voters so that they can contact them with their GOTV campaign in November, as well as their vote suppression efforts against Republican voters.

In an attempt to accomodate the Democrats' concerns, the ballot envelope contains an oath indicating that the voter did not participate in the primary or caucus of any other party (most Washington voters vote by mail).  The ballots of those who took the oath will be counted separately from those who did.

The Washington Democratic party will ignore the votes in the presidential primary.  The Republicans will use the votes in their presidential primary to select 51% of their delegates, with the other 49% based on caucuses.

Since most Washington voters vote by mail, many have already voted in the primary.  Clallam County reported that over 10% of registered voters had returned their ballots by the first available day.  There will be many times over voters participating in the primary as will participate in the caucuses.
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: February 10, 2008, 04:13:06 AM »
« Edited: February 10, 2008, 04:16:39 AM by Ben. »

Obama had a pretty policy heavy speech at the JJ... a good move on his part, though the first half was still very much 'boiler-plate' Obama (ie. 'change', 'yes we can' etc...), important that he begins to move beyond platitudes (Clinton gets away with it more easily - Obama wont be able to)... in fact he rounded off the speech very well, hitting the suggestion of being policy light.

All in all subtle shift in his rhetoric tonight, towards the style that would be more at home in a general election campaign.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: February 10, 2008, 04:21:24 AM »

Obama 52.6 to Clinton 44.8, so they under-estimated Obama's margin by like 12 points.

What's interesting is that they overestimated Clinton more than they underestimated Obama.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: February 10, 2008, 04:31:38 AM »

Ah, some of the odder voting patterns of last night did fix themselves while I was a-sleeping. Methinks that the map looks pretty ugly.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: February 10, 2008, 04:45:41 AM »

Awwwwwwwww...

Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: February 10, 2008, 04:46:57 AM »


Cheesy
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: February 10, 2008, 06:17:50 AM »

In an attempt to accomodate the Democrats' concerns, the ballot envelope contains an oath indicating that the voter did not participate in the primary or caucus of any other party (most Washington voters vote by mail).  The ballots of those who took the oath will be counted separately from those who did.

!
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: February 10, 2008, 06:34:16 AM »

Map of the Lyonesse results:

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: February 10, 2008, 06:34:41 AM »

Guess which county Edwards broke 15% in?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: February 10, 2008, 08:48:27 AM »

Clever game by the Obama camp. "Accidentally" release a delegate projection, then outperform it.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: February 10, 2008, 11:56:01 AM »

Guess which county Edwards broke 15% in?

At first, I though St. Bernard, but the Edwards vote wasn't really that high there.

After thinking a little more, I got the joke you were making - it was LaSalle Parish, where the county seat is Jena...  Tongue

Also, looks like there was a strong "lying about voting for a woman" tendency in the exit polling, not surprising for this area of the country (if my anecdotal observations in East Texas are any measure).  The strongest Clinton counties had abnormally high numbers of people (10%-20%) voting for white male candidates - amusing protest vote.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: February 10, 2008, 12:04:59 PM »

After thinking a little more, I got the joke you were making - it was LaSalle Parish, where the county seat is Jena...  Tongue

Grin

This is why primaries are great. It also voted 66% for David Duke in the '91 runoff (53% in the first round).
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: February 10, 2008, 12:14:13 PM »

After thinking a little more, I got the joke you were making - it was LaSalle Parish, where the county seat is Jena...  Tongue

Grin

This is why primaries are great. It also voted 66% for David Duke in the '91 runoff (53% in the first round).

Query:  I really haven't had a chance to look through the results in any detail yet.  Do you see any improvement for Obama among the groups he'll need to perform well to have a shot in say, Texas (because rural east Texas will count for something)?

I would say Ohio, but I know how different the two states are.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: February 10, 2008, 12:24:11 PM »

After thinking a little more, I got the joke you were making - it was LaSalle Parish, where the county seat is Jena...  Tongue

Grin

This is why primaries are great. It also voted 66% for David Duke in the '91 runoff (53% in the first round).

Query:  I really haven't had a chance to look through the results in any detail yet.  Do you see any improvement for Obama among the groups he'll need to perform well to have a shot in say, Texas (because rural east Texas will count for something)?

I would say Ohio, but I know how different the two states are.

Well in Lyonesse's only two lily white parishes (Cameron, Livingstone) he polled 18% and 22% respectively.

I'm actually about half way through some maps on this general thing so...
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: February 10, 2008, 12:36:41 PM »

After thinking a little more, I got the joke you were making - it was LaSalle Parish, where the county seat is Jena...  Tongue

Grin

This is why primaries are great. It also voted 66% for David Duke in the '91 runoff (53% in the first round).

Query:  I really haven't had a chance to look through the results in any detail yet.  Do you see any improvement for Obama among the groups he'll need to perform well to have a shot in say, Texas (because rural east Texas will count for something)?

I would say Ohio, but I know how different the two states are.

Well in Lyonesse's only two lily white parishes (Cameron, Livingstone) he polled 18% and 22% respectively.

I'm actually about half way through some maps on this general thing so...

I get your point - the answer is (almost likely) no.  Especially since most of east Texas outside Beaumont/Port Arthur resembles those areas and not the rest of Louisiana.

Though I'd be curious to know your thoughts when you're done.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 14 queries.