Constitutional Mad Scientist (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:59:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Constitutional Mad Scientist (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Constitutional Mad Scientist  (Read 4617 times)
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


« on: August 13, 2004, 11:42:01 PM »

If it were possible to prevent fraud with very good certainty, I don't think it'd be that bad of an idea.  It would save a lot of money if a person wouldn't have to run a re-election campaign at the end of a set term if the person would have obviously been re-elected.

Petitions aren't secret ( you have to out your name on them) so a bad ass government could make things hard for the signatories.
That's also true in the current system. The old Chicago Machine was notorious for getting back at anyone who signed a petition to place any candidate but their own on the ballot.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.