are Mormons Christians?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 06:44:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  are Mormons Christians?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Poll
Question: are Mormons Christians?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: are Mormons Christians?  (Read 22052 times)
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2008, 02:23:46 PM »

As I said, the Church reads from only the authorized King James Version of the Bible.

The authorized version which Joseph Smith used to plagiarize sections into the Book of Mormon?  The authorized version which was edited on Smith's whims without any other text to translate from?

No to both.

Does that mean you believe Mormon doctrine has a basis in the Old and New Testaments of the bible?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2008, 03:56:22 PM »

No. Joseph Smith was a liar and a false prophet who established a false religion of lies.

Can something like this not be said of all religions?

Yes, but it's not going to convince anyone arguing from the Mormon or the Christian side.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2008, 05:02:58 PM »

I vote we save ourselves several headaches and shut down this thread before we have to end up debating Mormon doctrine.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2008, 06:08:48 PM »

Yes, Mormons are Christians.  Some are probably more "Christian" than I, both in the doctrinal sense and in the "doing compassionate things" sense Tongue
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2008, 07:43:50 PM »

No. Joseph Smith was a liar and a false prophet who established a false religion of lies.

Can something like this not be said of all religions?

I agree with both statements here, actually...
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2008, 10:48:54 PM »

Does that mean you believe Mormon doctrine has a basis in the Old and New Testaments of the bible?

Yes I do.

I vote we save ourselves several headaches and shut down this thread before we have to end up debating Mormon doctrine.

It's only going to happen if you start it...

But, if you have examined the issues for yourself and have determined your own path with full confidence, then who am I to stand in your way with questions?  What could you possibly learn from me?  I do not claim that my doctrine is perfect and I'm sure my experience is tiny compared with your church with all its teachers and study courses.

You should be the one who teaches me, for it written, "As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another." (Pro 27:17)

But, if you teach me, I only ask you to follow the example of Jesus when he taught the Sadducees who only accepted a small portion of the canon as scripture.  Jesus was able to teach correct doctrine from the portion of scripture they accepted. So, since I only accept the Old and New Testaments, you’ll have to derive the Mormon doctrine from them and them only, for I will not accept the Book of Mormon as proof.

Agreed?  If so, you can start with whatever topic you desire.  Or, if you prefer, I will present a topic. just as the Sadducees presented a topic to Jesus.



Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 13, 2008, 11:34:42 PM »

But, if you teach me, I only ask you to follow the example of Jesus when he taught the Sadducees who only accepted a small portion of the canon as scripture.  Jesus was able to teach correct doctrine from the portion of scripture they accepted. So, since I only accept the Old and New Testaments, you’ll have to derive the Mormon doctrine from them and them only, for I will not accept the Book of Mormon as proof.

...I accept the Book of Mormon as the word of God, along with the Old and New Testaments.  They clarify each other and promote Christ-like living.  There are true doctrines (as I believe) that are found in each, and some that are not.  To separate the Book of Mormon from my canon of scriptures would not only separate me from a great strength that I draw from, but it would only almost make a debate worthless.

...Plus, I would hate you to play the part of the Sadducees.  If you want, instead of disproving each other, we could have a discussion on what each of our faiths actually believe.  I leave it to you.

You should know that I also respect the heritage of your Mormon faith.

I think our doctrinal differences stem from the differences of our approach.  If our approach was the same, our doctrines would be closer.

In the examples in the New Testament, I see Christ and the Apostles able to teach Christianity and derive Christian doctrine from the Old Testament, since that was the only scripture they could use to prove their points to their audience.  And, in the case of Sadducees, Jesus was able to derive doctrinal truth by using only the first five books of the Old Testament.

Therefore, I attempt to follow the same pattern:  I make sure I can trace every doctrine of mine throughout the length of scripture.

So, if Jesus and the Apostles were able to use the Old Testament to derive New Testament doctrine, shouldn't every Apostle of God, whether they claim to be Mormon or interdenominational, be able to do the same?  And if Jesus and the Apostles were able to do that with just the Old Testament, how much more should modern day Apostles be able to do that using both the Old and New Testaments?  After all, Christianity is suppossed to be the restoration of the early church, or at least follow the pattern of the early church, and not create a new church, right?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2008, 12:51:52 AM »

good it looks like we agree.  So does that mean you can use the New and Old Testaments to derive your doctrine?  After all, seeing that Jesus and the Apostles were able to use the Old Testament exclusively, how much it is to ask of you to use the Old and/or New Testament?
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2008, 03:06:35 AM »

good it looks like we agree.  So does that mean you can use the New and Old Testaments to derive your doctrine?  After all, seeing that Jesus and the Apostles were able to use the Old Testament exclusively, how much it is to ask of you to use the Old and/or New Testament?

Hrm...I did state that there have been certain truths lost from the Bible.  I think there is a great majority that can be found in the Bible, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the whole of the doctrine is.  Again, the reason for the Book of Mormon.

Wow... from out of the depths... welcome back.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 14, 2008, 08:36:34 AM »
« Edited: February 14, 2008, 09:37:07 AM by jmfcst »

good it looks like we agree.  So does that mean you can use the New and Old Testaments to derive your doctrine?  After all, seeing that Jesus and the Apostles were able to use the Old Testament exclusively, how much it is to ask of you to use the Old and/or New Testament?

Hrm...I did state that there have been certain truths lost from the Bible.  I think there is a great majority that can be found in the Bible, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the whole of the doctrine is.  Again, the reason for the Book of Mormon.

lost from the new testament or lost from the old testament?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 14, 2008, 11:05:23 AM »
« Edited: February 14, 2008, 11:10:11 AM by jmfcst »

lost from the new testament or lost from the old testament?

Each, with so many different translations and therefore different interpretations I don't think this is an unreasonable position.

then when were these Mormon teachings lost from the old and new testaments and who lost them?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 14, 2008, 11:34:54 AM »

then when were these Mormon teachings lost from the old and new testaments and who lost them?

Jmf, I do not want to rag on the Bible, but if we go down this road it will be seen by non-believers that I am (that's usually the nature of translation arguments).

I am more than willing to concede to you the argument that the bible was corrupted and the Mormon teachings lost from it.  I am simply trying to arrive at a point in time when you believe the bible was intact.  Do you believe the old testament was intact during the lives of Peter and Paul?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 14, 2008, 12:12:43 PM »

Hrmmmm, that was a hard question!  Smiley  Deserving of a lot of thought.  I would have to say that I do not believe it was intact during Christ's time.  There are many books referred to in the Bible that we don't even know anything about.  Therefore, seeing that the Bible was still in a process of being complied just a few hundred years before Christ, were those lost Books there I would guess we'd see them today.

ok, but even if I shatter a plate on the floor and lose half the pieces, none of the remaining pieces are going to conflict with the orginal plate, correct?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 14, 2008, 12:42:33 PM »


ok, but even if I shatter a plate on the floor and lose half the pieces, none of the remaining pieces are going to conflict with the original plate, correct?

In my opinion, it's hard to make an argument that the Bible would be intact if those pieces are missing.  I do know that with the plate analogy you're referring to the correctness of the Book, ya?  On that note, I'd say that the discrepancies between the Masoretic Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls in itself proves that translation was a problem, even in Christ's time.

So, if pieces were missing and the pieces that remained were corrupted during Christ's time and if the Apostles were aware of the corruption, why did the Apostles dedicate themselves to the public reading of "corrupted" scripture?  And if the Apostles believed it was corrupted, why did they instruct the church to use the corrupted scripture as a litmus test for determining truth?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 14, 2008, 01:10:08 PM »

So, if pieces were missing and the pieces that remained were corrupted during Christ's time and if the Apostles were aware of the corruption, why did the Apostles dedicate themselves to the public reading of "corrupted" scripture?  And if the Apostles believed it was corrupted, why did they instruct the church to use the corrupted scripture as a litmus test for determining truth?

Good argument.  My first point would be that, like the Bible today, they had to go with what they had.  I never said that the Bible is corrupted, but it's not perfect.  Reading the Bible, even today again, you have a rather large choice of which translations to choose from.  The existence of the Masoretic Text  and the differing Dead Sea Scrolls only shows that they had the same problem then.

Ok, there are problems with different sections of different translations of the bible.  But which translation or combination of translations of the bible did you use to validate the Book of Mormon was the restoration of what the early church taught?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 14, 2008, 01:22:35 PM »

Ok, there are problems with the different sections of different translations of the bible.  But which translation or combination of translations of the bible did you use to validate the Book of Mormon was the restoration of what the early church taught?

I've stated we use the authorized King James Version of the Bible.  The difference between the Bible and the Book of Mormon is simply the fact that they took place in different locations.  The people of the Book of Mormon didn't have the privilege of having Jesus' Mortal Ministry.  Again, going off of location, it wasn't the exact same church in the Book of Mormon, they didn't have some of the issues that the Mediterranean church had, but they had different ones.

As far as gospel teachings go, the King James Version of the Bible is closest to the true meaning.

so, then,  although the KJV lacks the full Mormon gospel, I can read the KJV and not find any contradictions between it and the Book of Mormon?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 14, 2008, 02:51:58 PM »


so, then,  although the KJV lacks the full Mormon gospel, I can read the KJV and not find any contradictions between it and the Book of Mormon?

I didn't say that.  You of all people should know that the Bible is a major subject to interpretation.

granted, but, from your point of view, what source did you use to verify the doctrines of the Book of Mormon were actually what the early church taught?  Obviously, you didn't pick Joseph Smith's translation of the Book Mormon as the standard of truth and disregard any connections to what came before.  So, what was your source of comparison?  Did you compare your interpretation of the KJV with the Book of Mormon and determined there were no contradictions?

Basically, I am asking you to name the bridge (the common denominator) you used in reaching your conclusion that the Book of Mormon was what the early church taught.  Name the bridge so that I can also travel along it.   
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 14, 2008, 03:05:35 PM »

Well first I think we would have to decide which doctrines the early church taught, as compared to contemporary religion.  I'll pick one (and I know this is the Doctrinal debate that's been coming, but do you agree to keep it a debate, and not an argument?), I posted this up in a poll that you should have seen, A Pre-Mortal existence.  This is taught by my church, and viewed as something early Christianity taught.

May I assume you do not believe in a Pre-Mortal existence?

is that a doctrine that is common to both the Book of Mormon and the Bible, or is it one that the Bible has lost?  (If it is one that is not in the Bible, then I'll concede the argument, for I have no way to determine its truth since I would be lacking a common denominator.)
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 14, 2008, 03:16:24 PM »

May I assume you do not believe in a Pre-Mortal existence?

is that a doctrine that is common to both the Book of Mormon and the Bible, or is it one that the Bible has lost?  (If it is one that is not in the Bible, then I'll concede the argument, for I have no way to determine its truth since I would be lacking a common denominator.)

Good ol' jmf, you don't want to be preached too. Smiley  I can understand, but yes I can support this with the Bible.  I know fully well what we're headed into, I must congratulate you on successfully getting me to debate points of doctrine.  Though, I'm doing this to support my beliefs, as found in both the Bible and Book of Mormon.  I do not expect to convert you, and I do not expect you to convert me.  We will discuss points of doctrine, as we see them, yes?

if it is in the Bible, then preach away.  Just give a short description of Pre-Mortal existence and cite the verses of the Bible that support it.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 14, 2008, 06:13:38 PM »

Mr. Fresh,

ok, what is the point in knowing that we existed prior to coming to earth?  to where does this doctrine lead?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 14, 2008, 06:31:52 PM »

Mr. Fresh,

ok, what is the point in knowing that we existed prior to coming to earth?  to where does this doctrine lead?

It leads to learning about the Plan of Salvation, there was indeed great reason for all the Sons of God to shout for joy once creation was finished.  This gave us a chance to come to Earth and live our lives.

and how does this knowledge of a previous life that I assume you can't remember affect your actions here on earth?  in other words, what action is prompted by this knowledge?
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 14, 2008, 07:06:44 PM »

No. They don't believe in Jesus as their savior so they are not.

LOL, I really hope you're joking.
You actually do believe in Jesus as Mormons? If you do thats great but I still don't consider you Christians. You guys added a whole book and made it more important to the Bible, where in my opinions God specifically instructed all Christians to never accept anything added to the Bible.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 14, 2008, 07:09:59 PM »

I don't know.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 14, 2008, 11:01:40 PM »

and how does this knowledge of a previous life that I assume you can't remember affect your actions here on earth?  in other words, what action is prompted by this knowledge?

Wouldn't it be nice if I could?  Point is I gave scriptures that supported this in the Bible.  Were you born with the full knowledge of Jesus Christ?

Let me ask a few questions regarding this subject:

Why didn't God just create us in heaven?  Why do we have to come to this life to suffer, live in anguish, and for some to reject God?  What is the point of creating Earth?

I meant:  What is the purpose of this doctrine?  What action from you does this doctrine prompt?  If it explains the "full" plan of salvation, does knowledge of this full plan of salvation require you to do anything different?
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,583
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 15, 2008, 09:34:30 PM »

You actually do believe in Jesus as Mormons? If you do thats great but I still don't consider you Christians. You guys added a whole book and made it more important to the Bible, where in my opinions God specifically instructed all Christians to never accept anything added to the Bible.

Can you back that up?

Rev. 22:18-19 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.