NH-Rasmussen: Obama defeats McCain by 13, Clinton only by 2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:23:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH-Rasmussen: Obama defeats McCain by 13, Clinton only by 2		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-Rasmussen: Obama defeats McCain by 13, Clinton only by 2  (Read 1772 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 13, 2008, 03:13:15 PM »
« edited: February 13, 2008, 03:33:50 PM by Tender Branson »
Obama: 49%
McCain: 36%

Clinton: 43%
McCain: 41%

In New Hampshire, McCain currently trails Clinton by twenty-five points among women and Obama by twenty-six. Among men, McCain leads Clinton by nineteen while holding just a single point advantage over Obama.

McCain wins 78% of Republican votes when matched against Clinton but just 64% against Obama.

Overall, Obama is viewed favorably by 62% of New Hampshire voters. McCain earns positive reviews from 58% and Clinton from 48%.

Thirty-two percent (32%) of New Hampshire voters have a Very Favorable opinion of Obama. Just 21% are that upbeat about Clinton while 14% say the same about McCain.

Thirty-four percent (34%) have a Very Unfavorable opinion of Clinton. Eighteen percent (18%) hold that view of Obama while 14% are that pessimistic about McCain.

Link
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2008, 03:23:05 PM »
« Edited: February 13, 2008, 03:31:56 PM by TheresNoMoney »
Look at that lead! Hell yes!
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2008, 03:27:21 PM »
Well.... NH looks like a blue state. So much for McCain taking it.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2008, 03:32:29 PM »

Sorry, fixed.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2008, 03:34:21 PM »

Fixed the link myself as well. Wink
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2008, 03:37:49 PM »
I will no longer trust NH polls that include Obama.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2008, 03:41:21 PM »
If Democrats nominate Obama and this holds up, Carol Shea-Porter will likely blow Jeb Bradley out of the water. 
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2008, 03:56:47 PM »
Quote from: Eraserhead on February 13, 2008, 03:37:49 PM
I will no longer trust NH polls that include Obama.

It's easier to poll a G/E with two well-known candidates than a primary with 5 candidates. And the lead is well outside the MOE.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2008, 05:08:30 PM »
McCain only pulling 64% of Republicans against Obama? He sure seems to have gotten popular among Republicans...
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2008, 06:09:12 PM »
DON'T WORRY GUYS. MCCAIN IS A MAVERICK SO HE CAN WIN NH.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2008, 06:13:10 PM »
Don't let your eyes deceive you. Clinton is obviously the most electable candidate. Roll Eyes
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2008, 06:27:17 PM »
Quote from: Epro on February 13, 2008, 06:13:10 PM
Don't let your eyes deceive you. Clinton is obviously the most electable candidate. Roll Eyes

Interestingly, in the Potomac primaries, Obama actually won those looking for electability 2-to-1.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2008, 02:53:32 AM »
So much for the theory that winning New Hampshire in the primary makes you the strongest candidate there in the general.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2008, 09:24:24 AM »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on February 14, 2008, 02:53:32 AM
So much for the theory that winning New Hampshire in the primary makes you the strongest candidate there in the general.

NH voters are already having buyers remorse with Clinton. They know a lot more about Obama now than they at the time of the primary.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2008, 06:41:08 PM »
Thanks to Rasmussen polls, New Hampshire has joined Nevada in the list of states that used to matter, but don't any more.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.