Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 18, 2013, 09:14:03 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2008 Elections
Selection: Santorum?
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Selection: Santorum? (Read 2071 times)
RJ
YaBB God
Posts: 667
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #25 on:
August 28, 2008, 10:54:58 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on August 28, 2008, 10:43:34 pm
Just because he didn't win them (again, consider his opponent) doesn't mean he doesn't have sway with them. McCain-Santorum vs. Obama-Biden would be nothing like Santorum vs. Casey. Obama-Biden doesn't have the type of appeal that the Casey name has with white, blue collar, Catholic voters.
While I disagree that this voting block we've argued over is as organized as you've made them out to be, when you lose an election by 17+ points, it stands to reason you've alienated just about every voting block there is. Don't get me wrong; I wouldn't have expected Rick to beat Casey but I would've figured he'd come closer than 17+points.
I think Santorum would be disaster for McCain amongst these voters.
Logged
Economic Left/Right: -4.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.36
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12211
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #26 on:
August 28, 2008, 10:55:29 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on August 28, 2008, 09:19:53 pm
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 09:10:17 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on August 28, 2008, 09:08:54 pm
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 09:06:46 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on August 28, 2008, 09:05:11 pm
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 09:00:13 pm
Quote from: WalterMitty on August 28, 2008, 08:56:41 pm
phil, santorum compared homosexuality to having sex with dogs.
mccain doesnt want to go there.
In addition Santorum would by default unify the democratic and liberal base.
Santorum doesn't irritate the Democratic voters that McCain still has a chance with.
Really?
? The only democratic voters Mccain has a chance with are older women and they are pro-abortion rights. Also Mccain has a chance to do relatively well with gays but yeah with Santorum..lololol
And since when are older women "Pro Abortion rights?"
Trust me Hillary voters are pro-abortion/women's rights. Those who aren't already vote republican.
Yay for simplistic thinking! I'm sure every Hillary supporter especially in states like Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, etc. are 100% Pro Choice/"Women's rights."
I never said they were 100% pro choice dumbass. But guess what a lot of them are. That is their issue, women's rights. Many of these Hillary supporters who are hesitant to go over to Obama's side are basically democrat on most issues, but for some reason felt Obama was given preferential treatment. They feel as if Hillary was not chosen
because
she was a woman. Democrats can win without winning blue collar catholics by decent margins, but they certainly cannot win when women don't vote with their usual high margins for democrats. There is a chance Mccain can pull away a lot of these
moderate
women voters, but he will not do it with Santorum. Anyways as I have said I would absolutely
love
for Santorum to be the pick.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #27 on:
August 28, 2008, 10:59:43 pm »
Quote from: RJ on August 28, 2008, 10:54:58 pm
While I disagree that this voting block we've argued over is as organized as you've made them out to be, when you lose an election by 17+ points, it stands to reason you've alienated just about every voting block there is. Don't get me wrong; I wouldn't have expected Rick to beat Casey but I would've figured he'd come closer than 17+points.
I think Santorum would be disaster for McCain amongst these voters.
I really have no idea how you can believe that "white, blue collar, Catholic voters" aren't a major, organized group especially in a state like PA. I really don't understand that. But, hey, whatever.
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 10:55:29 pm
I never said they were 100% pro choice dumbass.
Oh, ok! So the comment about them being Pro Choice or actually voting Republican meant what exactly?
Quote
But guess what a lot of them are. That is their issue, women's rights. Many of these Hillary supporters who are hesitant to go over to Obama's side are basically democrat on most issues, but for some reason felt Obama was given preferential treatment. They feel as if Hillary was not chosen
because
she was a woman. Democrats can win without winning blue collar catholics by decent margins, but they certainly cannot win when women don't vote with their usual high margins for democrats.
I'm not expecting to win Hillary's original base (her personal fan club). However, plenty of blue collar, populist types that would have been huge for Edwards ended up going for her over Obama. They might not be the Hillary fanatics but they consider themselves more loyal to Hillary than Obama. Right now, a lot of them don't have a candidate to back. Let's see what happens.
Quote
Anyways as I have said I would absolutely
love
for Santorum to be the pick.
Ok, great!
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
Posts: 18390
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #28 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm »
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Logged
Do not fight with one another over my banning. I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave. It is what I want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I
I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.
Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12211
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #29 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm »
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #30 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:16:43 pm »
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
jmf is full of common sense, just as long as you keep the conversation away from Jesus.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12211
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #31 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:17:47 pm »
Quote from: Supersoulty on August 28, 2008, 11:16:43 pm
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
jmf is full of common sense, just as long as you keep the conversation away from Jesus.
Well I just had to say that because he thinks Palin will be Mccain's VP so he's not totally full of common sense.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #32 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:18:26 pm »
Quote from: Supersoulty on August 28, 2008, 11:16:43 pm
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
jmf is full of common sense, just as long as you keep the conversation away from Jesus.
Hell, back when he posted more often, jmf was one of the forums most profound posters... not to say he isn't now, but he doesn't post enough.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
JSojourner
YaBB God
Posts: 11688
Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #33 on:
August 28, 2008, 11:23:27 pm »
Quote from: WalterMitty on August 28, 2008, 08:56:41 pm
phil, santorum compared homosexuality to having sex with dogs.
mccain doesnt want to go there.
I think Santorum didn't compare the two. I think he said one led to the other. I'm not completely sure what he meant. But I suspect it follows along the lines of some preachers...
"Adam and Steve get tired of the buttsex and need something more titilating to get off...so they go after Rover and Fido."
I'm not sure which idea is crazier. But at least Santorum has never said gays should be put to death. I gotta give him props for that.
Logged
angus
YaBB God
Posts: 13218
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #34 on:
August 29, 2008, 10:30:57 am »
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
jmfcst is one of the most well-informed posters. He's a regular listener of NPR and stays abreast of current events better than most folks. Myself included. He can be intimidating, though.
Logged
JSojourner
YaBB God
Posts: 11688
Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #35 on:
August 29, 2008, 10:51:20 am »
Quote from: angus on August 29, 2008, 10:30:57 am
Quote from: sbane on August 28, 2008, 11:12:56 pm
Quote from: jmfcst on August 28, 2008, 11:00:21 pm
Santorum would end McCain chances...
next
Some common sense from an unlikely source.
jmfcst is one of the most well-informed posters. He's a regular listener of NPR and stays abreast of current events better than most folks. Myself included. He can be intimidating, though.
I agree he is well-informed. And he and I have our serious tussles. But intimidating? Nah, he's a pretty nice fellow.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12211
Re: Selection: Santorum?
«
Reply #36 on:
August 29, 2008, 01:08:21 pm »
Well congratulations are certainly on the order for jmfct. Not only did he have the common sense to understand Santorum would be a bad pick but he also guessed right that it would be Palin. Well done sir.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...