Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2013, 04:07:53 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  does Obama have a better chance of winning Colorado than Ohio?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: does Obama have a better chance of winning Colorado than Ohio?  (Read 825 times)
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34294
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: February 21, 2008, 01:03:11 am »
Ignore

does Obama have a better chance of winning Colorado than Ohio?
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4562


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2008, 01:04:33 am »
Ignore

I'd say so
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27998
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2008, 01:06:40 am »
Ignore

Obama should win both slightly.

Ohio:

Obama - 50.5%
McCain - 49.0%

Colorado:

Obama - 50.8%
McCain - 48.7%
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16900


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2008, 01:09:55 am »
Ignore

Definitely. Obama could really sweep Colorado substantially (up to 54-45), but any win in Ohio would be narrow.
Logged
auburntiger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1258
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.61, S: 0.65

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2008, 01:18:13 am »
Ignore

I think so, BUT:

Obama isn't going to sweep Colorado by a 9 point margin, not with McCain as his opponent. He might win the state, but not more than 1-2% points. I think Colorado will be the pivital state this year like Ohio was in 2004 and Florida in 2000. Not sure before that what state(s) were the pivotal ones.
 
As far as Ohio goes, I think it depends how well Obama does in the primary there. If hillary wins by a comfortable margin, I'm calling for a VERY narrow McCain victory. Why? B/c now Obama is the clear frontrunner and if he doesn't win Ohio or get within 10 points, it shows he's not that popular with Ohians on the whole. McCain would do well with the older generation.

with the handful of "barely Bush" states in 2004, here's what I think the order will be from more Dem to more GOP: Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio. But in between NV and OH, I'm tempted to throw in Missouri and/or Virginia. I'm feeling confident about FL staying red
« Last Edit: February 21, 2008, 01:23:15 am by auburntiger »Logged

Moderate Republican turned Independent.
Rococo4
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1502


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2008, 01:25:14 am »
Ignore

no.

he could win or lose both, but he has a better chance to win Ohio.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24388
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2008, 01:36:32 am »
Ignore

So many articles have been written that Colorado is moving Dem for a decade, and somehow it never pans out much for Federal elections. This is one of the most oversold psephological theories out there.
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36286
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2008, 01:59:06 am »
Ignore

I'd say he has a better shot in CO. White Westerners love the guy.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34294
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2008, 02:03:44 am »
Ignore

tougher question -

does he have a better chance in Colorado than in Pennsylvania?
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56548
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2008, 06:25:33 am »
Ignore

quite possibly on the first, probably not on the second. Impossible to say.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
TheGlobalizer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3310
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2008, 11:23:45 am »
Ignore

Colorado > Ohio for Obama.
Logged
Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28526
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2008, 11:42:00 am »
Ignore

As near-worthless as general election polls are at this point in the campaign, it's still interesting to note that Rasmussen recently had Obama beating McCain by 7 points in Colorado (link), and McCain beating Obama by 1 point in Ohio (link).


So many articles have been written that Colorado is moving Dem for a decade, and somehow it never pans out much for Federal elections. This is one of the most oversold psephological theories out there.

I do think that the magnitude of the Democratic trend in Colorado has been greatly overestimated.  However, we've already seen more than one poll showing Obama winning the state at this early stage, whereas not a single poll showed Kerry winning it in 2004.
Logged

Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27978


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2008, 11:48:18 am »
Ignore

Talk to me in 8 months.  Personally, I suspect the answer is no.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34294
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2008, 11:50:45 am »
Ignore

for what it's worth (and it's not worth much, with Hillary still trading at 18.6% to win the nomination and low volume), COLORADO.DEM is trading at 51.5 and OHIO.DEM at 70.0.     PENNSYLVANIA.DEM is at 76.5
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3825


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2008, 12:10:37 pm »
Ignore

In the primary, yes.  In the general, no.

Colorado Dems are more "crunchy granola Dems" whereas Ohio Dems are "labor Dems".  Obama plays better to the crunchy granola side of the party than he does to the labor wing.

In the general election the Right-wing Pro-Military part of Colorado will turn out.  In the general election the Republicans will draw a stark contrast between McCain's military career and what they will paint as a lack of patriotism on Obama's part.
Logged
InsaneTrollLogic
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10949
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2008, 12:30:58 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, but the military base isn't as strong as the fundies. McCain won't get major fundy turnout..and the darker side of me is say that since these votes are so in one place, they will be easily suppressed...but I doubt the dems in CO have that sort of gumption and ethical challenge. 
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26096


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2008, 01:41:08 pm »
Ignore

I've seen the polls. Obama has a better chance at winning Colorado than Hillary Clinton certainly. But in the end, I don't know...Colorado always struck me as the kind of state McCain would do well in. Right now it seems like the polls reflect only views of Obama and I expect that to change as we approach election day. So I haven't made up my mind about this quite yet.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory