Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 08:30:36 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
| | | |-+  PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania  (Read 3084 times)
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2093
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: March 06, 2008, 01:48:43 pm »

New Poll: Pennsylvania President by Rasmussen on 2008-03-05

Summary:
Clinton:
52%
Obama:
37%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
11%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34280
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 03:48:16 pm »
Ignore

ugly
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27984
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Logged
MSUfan
Jtfdem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6509
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2008, 03:54:07 pm »
Ignore

I'll wait for SUSA.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12933
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2008, 04:28:49 pm »
Ignore

Well, we certainly wont be busy. Time to go knock on doors!
Logged

“The meaning of life is not to be discovered only after death in some hidden, mysterious realm; on the contrary, it can be found by eating the succulent fruit of the Tree of Life and by living in the here and now as fully and creatively as we can”

~~~~Dr. Paul Kurtz (1925-2012)
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27118


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2008, 05:44:39 pm »
Ignore

I've stopped trusting polls that aren't SUSA.
Logged

Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12181
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.

Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49380


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2008, 05:57:01 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.

Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...

He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27118


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2008, 06:00:27 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.

Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...

He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2008, 06:01:33 pm »
Ignore

Counting only serious polls in Ohio near the end, it was practically nailed, SUSA had Hillary up 10, PPP had her up 9. There was barely any polls from RI, the last one was Feb. 23 with Hillary up 15, below her margin but so long ago. Same deal in Vermont basically, Rasmussen had him up 24 more than a week before. Also the Rasmussen poll could've easily been accurate if the undecideds broke for Hillary.
Logged

All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36297
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2008, 07:01:01 pm »
Ignore

Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.

As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).
« Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 07:04:08 pm by Eraserhead »Logged
HockeyDude
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4527
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.26, S: -8.26

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2008, 08:39:50 pm »
Ignore

Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.

As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).

He needs to mobilize the Philly area and have a respectable showing there.
Logged



LET'S GO RANGERS!  2013 PLAYOFFS!
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27978


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2008, 08:54:50 pm »
Ignore

Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.

As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).

He needs to mobilize the Philly area and have a respectable showing there.

Addendum:  You mean the black, upper-income areas of Philly.  Too bad Rendell's people won't be around to help.

More importantly, he needs to get as many Republicans in SE PA to switch their registrations to Democrat.  That'll probably be more help than turnout efforts.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49380


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2008, 09:46:26 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.

Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...

He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.

LOL

Polls didn't show RI, OH and VT much closer/a big win for Obama?

Ok!

Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.

As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).

Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Reaganfan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11946
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2008, 10:11:02 pm »
Ignore

Facts are facts. Hillary is back...Obama is in a rut.
Logged
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27118


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2008, 10:37:36 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.

Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.

Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...

He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.

LOL

Polls didn't show RI, OH and VT much closer/a big win for Obama?

Ok!
The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.

Ohio polls were pretty much right on, in some cases even more pro-Clinton that the state eventually was, with the one outlier being Zogby.

The one good poll in Vermont (Rasmussen) gave Obama a 24 point lead, 10 days before the primary. Obama ended up winning by 22 points.

What were you saying again?
Logged

All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36297
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2008, 02:59:12 am »
Ignore

Facts are facts. Hillary is back...Obama is in a rut.

Yep that fairly large, unchanged delegate lead is clearly a sign that he is in a bad way.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2008, 04:39:57 am »
Ignore

Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?

Frankly it wouldn't surprise me if Obama won more net delegates out of Wyoming than Hillary does out of Pennsylvania.

Before you laugh at that: Go take a look at the delegate numbers in Idaho and New Jersey.
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26101


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2008, 06:21:44 am »
Ignore

Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?

Frankly it wouldn't surprise me if Obama won more net delegates out of Wyoming than Hillary does out of Pennsylvania.

Before you laugh at that: Go take a look at the delegate numbers in Idaho and New Jersey.

I know what you're saying and there is some truth to it, but New Jersey was won by 6%, right? Pennsylvania could be much larger.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49380


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm »
Ignore

The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.

I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.

Quote
Ohio polls were pretty much right on, in some cases even more pro-Clinton that the state eventually was, with the one outlier being Zogby.

There weren't several polls showing Obama within single digits?

Quote
The one good poll in Vermont (Rasmussen) gave Obama a 24 point lead, 10 days before the primary. Obama ended up winning by 22 points.


Right...Rasmussen was the good poll. Not like it's being trashed by Obama supporters elsewhere or anything...
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16900


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2008, 04:18:43 pm »
Ignore

The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.

I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.

The initial exit poll had it very surprisingly close.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26101


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2008, 04:20:24 pm »
Ignore

The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.

I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.

The initial exit poll had it very surprisingly close.

Yeah. The polling did not show Obama leading or tieing, but they did create a feeling that he was having momentum and that Clinton was sinking fast. Then the exit polls confirmed that and made the eventual Clinton victory seem like more of a surprise than it should have been.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2008, 04:22:16 pm »
Ignore

There weren't several polls showing Obama within single digits?

All quite a bit before the primary. It's possible he was that close then, but Hillary closed well. Impossible to say.

Right...Rasmussen was the good poll. Not like it's being trashed by Obama supporters elsewhere or anything...

The only other polls taken out of Vermont were ARG. So Rasmussen was the only somewhat credible pollster who polled Vermont at all.
Logged

WalterMitty
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18832


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 07, 2008, 04:23:13 pm »
Ignore

id be happy seeing this poll if the election was next week.

but it isnt.

it isnt until late april.   a lot can change.

i expect a very tough fight for pa.
Logged

the individuals pictured below are freedom fighters:

I don't have time to argue pointless rhetoric.  I've got severe weather to track.

Politicus, those pictures get me very excited
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory