Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 21, 2013, 08:30:36 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2008 Elections
2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania (Read 3084 times)
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
Posts: 2093
PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
on:
March 06, 2008, 01:48:43 pm »
New Poll:
Pennsylvania President by Rasmussen on 2008-03-05
Summary:
Clinton:
52%
Obama:
37%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
11%
Poll Source URL:
Full Poll Details
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
Posts: 34280
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #1 on:
March 06, 2008, 03:48:16 pm »
ugly
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"
registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 27984
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #2 on:
March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm »
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Logged
MSUfan
Jtfdem
YaBB God
Posts: 6509
Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 4.70
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #3 on:
March 06, 2008, 03:54:07 pm »
I'll wait for SUSA.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
Posts: 12933
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #4 on:
March 06, 2008, 04:28:49 pm »
Well, we certainly wont be busy. Time to go knock on doors!
Logged
“The meaning of life is not to be discovered only after death in some hidden, mysterious realm; on the contrary, it can be found by eating the succulent fruit of the Tree of Life and by living in the here and now as fully and creatively as we can”
~~~~Dr. Paul Kurtz (1925-2012)
Lief
YaBB God
Posts: 27118
Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #5 on:
March 06, 2008, 05:44:39 pm »
I've stopped trusting polls that aren't SUSA.
Logged
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 12181
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #6 on:
March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm »
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Logged
Quote from: © Tweedism is for poseurs in junior high on January 31, 2013, 04:28:53 pm
Mr Moderate at 54/10 is a total joke, he is a horror.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68121
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #7 on:
March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49380
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #8 on:
March 06, 2008, 05:57:01 pm »
Quote from: I Drink Your Milkshake! on March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Lief
YaBB God
Posts: 27118
Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #9 on:
March 06, 2008, 06:00:27 pm »
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 05:57:01 pm
Quote from: I Drink Your Milkshake! on March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68121
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #10 on:
March 06, 2008, 06:01:33 pm »
Counting only serious polls in Ohio near the end, it was practically nailed, SUSA had Hillary up 10, PPP had her up 9. There was barely any polls from RI, the last one was Feb. 23 with Hillary up 15, below her margin but so long ago. Same deal in Vermont basically, Rasmussen had him up 24 more than a week before. Also the Rasmussen poll could've easily been accurate if the undecideds broke for Hillary.
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36297
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #11 on:
March 06, 2008, 07:01:01 pm »
Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.
As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).
«
Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 07:04:08 pm by Eraserhead
»
Logged
HockeyDude
YaBB God
Posts: 4527
Political Matrix
E: -6.26, S: -8.26
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #12 on:
March 06, 2008, 08:39:50 pm »
Quote from: Eraserhead on March 06, 2008, 07:01:01 pm
Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.
As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).
He needs to mobilize the Philly area and have a respectable showing there.
Logged
LET'S GO RANGERS! 2013 PLAYOFFS!
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #13 on:
March 06, 2008, 08:54:50 pm »
Quote from: TakeOurCountryBack on March 06, 2008, 08:39:50 pm
Quote from: Eraserhead on March 06, 2008, 07:01:01 pm
Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.
As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).
He needs to mobilize the Philly area and have a respectable showing there.
Addendum: You mean the black, upper-income areas of Philly. Too bad Rendell's people won't be around to help.
More importantly, he needs to get as many Republicans in SE PA to switch their registrations to Democrat. That'll probably be more help than turnout efforts.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49380
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #14 on:
March 06, 2008, 09:46:26 pm »
Quote from: Lt. Gov. Lief on March 06, 2008, 06:00:27 pm
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 05:57:01 pm
Quote from: I Drink Your Milkshake! on March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.
LOL
Polls didn't show RI, OH and VT much closer/a big win for Obama?
Ok!
Quote from: Eraserhead on March 06, 2008, 07:01:01 pm
Research 2000 greatly underestimated Obama in VT.
As for PA, Obama should downplay it's importance. Clinton has the entire machine behind her there. He won't win it (barring a miracle).
Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Reaganfan
YaBB God
Posts: 11946
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #15 on:
March 06, 2008, 10:11:02 pm »
Facts are facts. Hillary is back...Obama is in a rut.
Logged
Lief
YaBB God
Posts: 27118
Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -6.54
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #16 on:
March 06, 2008, 10:37:36 pm »
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 09:46:26 pm
Quote from: Lt. Gov. Lief on March 06, 2008, 06:00:27 pm
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 05:57:01 pm
Quote from: I Drink Your Milkshake! on March 06, 2008, 05:55:56 pm
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on March 06, 2008, 05:54:13 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on March 06, 2008, 03:49:04 pm
Rasmussen tends to overrate Obama, therefore Clinton is actually ahead by about 20% right now.
Most pollsters tend to overrate Obama.
Uh, no. Most pollsters tend to UNDERRATE him. The only states he overpolled in were California and New Hampshire. Conversely look at Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Missouri...
He also overpolled in RI, OH and VT.
False, false, and false.
LOL
Polls didn't show RI, OH and VT much closer/a big win for Obama?
Ok!
The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.
Ohio polls were pretty much right on, in some cases even more pro-Clinton that the state eventually was, with the one outlier being Zogby.
The one good poll in Vermont (Rasmussen) gave Obama a 24 point lead, 10 days before the primary. Obama ended up winning by 22 points.
What were you saying again?
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36297
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #17 on:
March 07, 2008, 02:59:12 am »
Quote from: Mike for McCain on March 06, 2008, 10:11:02 pm
Facts are facts. Hillary is back...Obama is in a rut.
Yep that fairly large, unchanged delegate lead is clearly a sign that he is in a bad way.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68121
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #18 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:39:57 am »
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 09:46:26 pm
Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?
Frankly it wouldn't surprise me if Obama won more net delegates out of Wyoming than Hillary does out of Pennsylvania.
Before you laugh at that: Go take a look at the delegate numbers in Idaho and New Jersey.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26101
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #19 on:
March 07, 2008, 06:21:44 am »
Quote from: I Drink Your Milkshake! on March 07, 2008, 04:39:57 am
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 06, 2008, 09:46:26 pm
Downplay PA and make...what...Wyoming into a huge deal? Sorry but who looks silly then?
Frankly it wouldn't surprise me if Obama won more net delegates out of Wyoming than Hillary does out of Pennsylvania.
Before you laugh at that: Go take a look at the delegate numbers in Idaho and New Jersey.
I know what you're saying and there is some truth to it, but New Jersey was won by 6%, right? Pennsylvania could be much larger.
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49380
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #20 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm »
Quote from: Lt. Gov. Lief on March 06, 2008, 10:37:36 pm
The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.
I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.
Quote
Ohio polls were pretty much right on, in some cases even more pro-Clinton that the state eventually was, with the one outlier being Zogby.
There weren't several polls showing Obama within single digits?
Quote
The one good poll in Vermont (Rasmussen) gave Obama a 24 point lead, 10 days before the primary. Obama ended up winning by 22 points.
Right...Rasmussen was the good poll. Not like it's being trashed by Obama supporters elsewhere or anything...
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #21 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:18:43 pm »
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm
Quote from: Lt. Gov. Lief on March 06, 2008, 10:37:36 pm
The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.
I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.
The initial exit poll had it very surprisingly close.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26101
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #22 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:20:24 pm »
Quote from: Verily on March 07, 2008, 04:18:43 pm
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm
Quote from: Lt. Gov. Lief on March 06, 2008, 10:37:36 pm
The one real poll from Rhode Island showed Clinton up 15, over a week before the primary. She ended up winning by 18 points.
I could have sworn there was a lot of hype about RI possibly being very close after a poll was released. I'm probably mistaken.
The initial exit poll had it very surprisingly close.
Yeah. The polling did not show Obama leading or tieing, but they did create a feeling that he was having momentum and that Clinton was sinking fast. Then the exit polls confirmed that and made the eventual Clinton victory seem like more of a surprise than it should have been.
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68121
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #23 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:22:16 pm »
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm
There weren't several polls showing Obama within single digits?
All quite a bit before the primary. It's possible he was that close then, but Hillary closed well. Impossible to say.
Quote from: President Keystone Phil on March 07, 2008, 04:16:11 pm
Right...Rasmussen was the good poll. Not like it's being trashed by Obama supporters elsewhere or anything...
The only other polls taken out of Vermont were ARG. So Rasmussen was the only somewhat credible pollster who polled Vermont at all.
Logged
WalterMitty
YaBB God
Posts: 18832
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26
Re: PA PrimD: Rasmussen: Clinton With Strong Lead in Pennsylvania
«
Reply #24 on:
March 07, 2008, 04:23:13 pm »
id be happy seeing this poll if the election was next week.
but it isnt.
it isnt until late april. a lot can change.
i expect a very tough fight for pa.
Logged
the individuals pictured below are freedom fighters:
Quote from: BushKenya on May 18, 2013, 05:59:26 pm
I don't have time to argue pointless rhetoric. I've got severe weather to track.
Quote from: BushKenya on May 16, 2013, 04:24:41 pm
Politicus, those pictures get me very excited
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...