Steve King "Al Qaeda would Cheer Obama win"

[Smash255]

This putz has made numerous insane comments during his tenure in the house, but his latest pile of crap may have outdone them all.  Steve King said al Qaeda would cheer an Obama win and be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did after 9/11.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/08/politics/main3919500.shtml

[Lief 🗽]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

ELECT OBAMA AND TERRORISTS WILL DANCE IN STREETS.

[Alcon]

It's really amazing what complete partisanship can delude you into making yourself believe.

[Smash255]

It's really amazing what complete partisanship can delude you into making yourself believe.

What about being a complete and utter assclown??

[Alcon]

It's really amazing what complete partisanship can delude you into making yourself believe.

What about being a complete and utter assclown??

That too.

What else has King said in the past, anyway?  I've missed out.

[Smash255]

It's really amazing what complete partisanship can delude you into making yourself believe.

What about being a complete and utter assclown??

That too.

What else has King said in the past, anyway?  I've missed out.

He has claimed that history has shown McCarthy to be a hero to America

has this little remark on immigration

You must be logged in to read this quote.

said Abu Ghraib was basically just like hazing,  has stated his wife had a better chance of being killed in D.C than a civilian in Iraq

[Meeker]

Damn Iowa and their ungerrymanderable districts...

[dead0man]

Why would an American vote for or against a candidate because of what our enemies say?  I've never been able to follow that logic.

[JohnFKennedy]

On the plus side, if the terrorists are dancing in the streets then they become vastly more accessible targets.

[??????????]

Do you think terrorist leaders will really sit down and talk with Obama and his administration?

[Alcon]

Do you think terrorist leaders will really sit down and talk with Obama and his administration?

No, clearly they will be too busy dancing in the streets because of his middle name.

[Ban my account ffs!]

Do you think terrorist leaders will really sit down and talk with Obama and his administration?

No, clearly they will be too busy dancing in the streets because of his middle name.

Dancing to what?

Awful machine produced music blasted through loud speakers hooked up to a cheap 1991 American made Boom Box tape player?  It'd only be a matter of time before 6-700 people were trampled and killed and the rest of the world just nervously laughed.

[Franzl]

Do you think terrorist leaders will really sit down and talk with Obama and his administration?

Nobody, not even Obama, has made this claim.

[Saxwsylvania]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

[JSojourner]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

They sure love Beelzebush.  He's Osama's wet dream...gave him everything he wanted on a silver platter...including a foothold in Iraq.  Nice going, "commander guy".  Mission accomplished!

[The Duke]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

They sure love Beelzebush.  He's Osama's wet dream...gave him everything he wanted on a silver platter...including a foothold in Iraq.  Nice going, "commander guy".  Mission accomplished!

Actually, Vander Blubb is right.

Obama's plan to attack Pakistan is Al Qaeda's dream come true.

And Al Qaeda in Iraq has essentially been destroyed by the surge, so no, AQ doesn't have a foothold in Iraq.

[Franzl]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

They sure love Beelzebush.  He's Osama's wet dream...gave him everything he wanted on a silver platter...including a foothold in Iraq.  Nice going, "commander guy".  Mission accomplished!

Actually, Vander Blubb is right.

Obama's plan to attack Pakistan is Al Qaeda's dream come true.

And Al Qaeda in Iraq has essentially been destroyed by the surge, so no, AQ doesn't have a foothold in Iraq.

plan to attack Pakistan....no further comment....

[Iosif is a COTHO]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

And it's clear that ultra-violent neo-Nazis would favor John McCain the most, therefore John McCain is an ultra violent neo-nazi...  Can't fail that logic.

[JohnFKennedy]

And Al Qaeda in Iraq has essentially been destroyed by the surge, so no, AQ doesn't have a foothold in Iraq.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7287917.stm

Perhaps spoken too soon?

[Saxwsylvania]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

And it's clear that ultra-violent neo-Nazis would favor John McCain the most, therefore John McCain is an ultra violent neo-nazi...  Can't fail that logic.

Given Obama's disregard for the Jews, I'm not sure who they would favor.

[GMantis]

This is extreme hackery, considering that radical muslims would most likely consider Obama as apostate and deserving death.

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

And it's clear that ultra-violent neo-Nazis would favor John McCain the most, therefore John McCain is an ultra violent neo-nazi...  Can't fail that logic.

Given Obama's disregard for the Jews, I'm not sure who they would favor.

How has Obama disregarded Jews?

[??????????]

Of the three options, it's clear that Al Qaeda would favor Obama the most.

And it's clear that ultra-violent neo-Nazis would favor John McCain the most, therefore John McCain is an ultra violent neo-nazi...  Can't fail that logic.

Given Obama's disregard for the Jews, I'm not sure who they would favor.

Especially considering Obamas pastors' close alliance with Mr. Farrakhan.

Do you think terrorist leaders will really sit down and talk with Obama and his administration?

Nobody, not even Obama, has made this claim.

Obama has said that he wants to sit down and discuss issues with Irans leadership. So yes he does want to sit down and talk with terrorist leaders.

[Person Man]

Gee... look at the vastness of this hackery. The neo-cons of the 2000s are the hippies of the 1960s in their hackery and willingness to attack their own countrymen. These neo-cons are at least as dangerous as the threats they combat. That's what you get when you humor bullies and liars.

...and how would neogotiating with terrorists be such a bad thing? Isn't the surge partially about neogotiating with terrorists?

[??????????]

...and how would neogotiating with terrorists be such a bad thing? Isn't the surge partially about neogotiating with terrorists?

**dies laughing**

[Person Man]

Well, ignorance is bliss... i guess....and I guess at 10 bucks a day a head, its worth it.