Early Polls Don't Really Mean Much.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:37:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Early Polls Don't Really Mean Much.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Early Polls Don't Really Mean Much.  (Read 5838 times)
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 14, 2004, 12:44:52 AM »

oh lol
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 14, 2004, 07:42:51 AM »

Miami,

It's WAY too early to make any statements about how good a President George W. Bush will be. However, if Democracy takes hold in Iraq and Afghanistan, there's a good possibility that it will spread to other Middle Eastern nations. If that happens, how do you think history will treat Bush as a President about 50 years down the road? Please be objective now...you're one of the few Dems on this site I would trust to give an honest, objective answer to a question like this.
Listen, these deficits that Bush is running up are higher than they were in the Reagan years!  National Debt keeps increasing.  And, Bush is the only president since Herbert Hoover to lose jobs.  Bush is one of the least fiscally responsible presidents in history, even ahead of Reagan.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 14, 2004, 08:06:06 AM »

This is where Bush is in comparison to 1996 (both Gallup):

(2004)
2/6-8 (Bush-Kerry-Undecided): 49-48-3
1/29 - 2/1 (Bush-Kerry-Undecided): 46-53-1
1/9-11 (Bush-Kerry-Undecided): 55-43-2

(1996)
3/15-17 (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 54-42-4
3/8-10 (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 54-42-4
2/23-25 (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 56-40-4
1/26-29 (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 54-42-4
1/12-15  (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 48-49-3
1/5-7  (Clinton-Dole-Undecided): 46-49-5

Clinton did benefit from a tough GOP primary fight.  Bush doesn't really get that benefit.


Are comparing Bush to Clinton b/c of incumbency, or to Dole b/c of being Republican? I am guessing the former, that makes more sense, but it's still something to remember.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 14, 2004, 08:53:56 AM »

I don't think Bush will win like Clinton did in 1996.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 14, 2004, 09:04:35 AM »

I don't think Bush will win like Clinton did in 1996.

No, probably not. This election might be a little unique, actually. When was the last time we had an election where one candidate won clearly, but not overwhelmingly in the PV, and did likeise in the EV?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 14, 2004, 09:06:07 AM »

And, if Kerry wins, it will be the first time a Dem has won the oval office without taking 5 southern states.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 14, 2004, 09:17:32 AM »

I don't think Bush will win like Clinton did in 1996.

No, probably not. This election might be a little unique, actually. When was the last time we had an election where one candidate won clearly, but not overwhelmingly in the PV, and did likeise in the EV?
1992. Slightly less clearly in the PV (6 points instead of eicht), slightly less clearly in the EV (12 votes less)

Clinton got 68% of the EV. That's not close, His percentage margin was 37% in the EV, as compared to 6% in the PV.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2004, 09:26:53 AM »

Perot's impact kinda messed up 1992, but not so much 1996.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2004, 09:28:07 AM »

Perot's impact kinda messed up 1992, but not so much 1996.

It did, but it needn't really impact the relation between Clinton's PV margin and his EV margin.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 14, 2004, 09:30:01 AM »

But that applies for 1996 as well, so what's your point? "Clearly but not overwhelmingly", you called his 1996 margin. If that's true then, it's true in 1992 also. Or am I misunderstanding something?

I think so. I see how my quote might have messed things up. What I meant was that if Bush beats Kerry 52-48 or something like that, and wins the EV roughly 308-230, that would be kind of unique, with the EV percentages resmebling the PV one, and the election being pretty close.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 14, 2004, 10:05:51 AM »

But that applies for 1996 as well, so what's your point? "Clearly but not overwhelmingly", you called his 1996 margin. If that's true then, it's true in 1992 also. Or am I misunderstanding something?
I think so. I see how my quote might have messed things up. What I meant was that if Bush beats Kerry 52-48 or something like that, and wins the EV roughly 308-230, that would be kind of unique, with the EV percentages resmebling the PV one, and the election being pretty close.

Ah yes. I thought you'd called 1996 unique. After all, 1980 had a similar PV margin and a much larger EV one...

Yeah, the quote was dum, I was talking about the coming election.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 14, 2004, 01:23:15 PM »
« Edited: February 14, 2004, 01:23:39 PM by supersoulty »

I don't think Bush will win like Clinton did in 1996.

No, probably not. This election might be a little unique, actually. When was the last time we had an election where one candidate won clearly, but not overwhelmingly in the PV, and did likeise in the EV?

Carter v Ford 76
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 14, 2004, 01:27:32 PM »

I don't think Bush will win like Clinton did in 1996.

No, probably not. This election might be a little unique, actually. When was the last time we had an election where one candidate won clearly, but not overwhelmingly in the PV, and did likeise in the EV?

Carter v Ford 76

True, but that was a very close election. True though, that it's the last time that PV and EV were close to each other. They seldom are...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 14 queries.