Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2014, 03:51:59 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  10% National Swings
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 10% National Swings  (Read 3835 times)
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38875
Bangladesh


View Profile
« on: March 16, 2008, 01:27:14 pm »
Ignore

This is a totally useless excercise that popped into my head after I did a '72 map with a 10% national swing to McGovern.

2004, 10% to Kerry:



428-110

2004, 10% to Bush:



523-15

2000, 10% to Gore:



509-29

2000, 10% to Bush:



498-40
« Last Edit: March 16, 2008, 02:09:19 pm by Vice-Chairman Xahar »Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29667
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2008, 02:04:55 pm »
Ignore

Nor would a 10% swing in WA make it >60 Bush.  I assume you're just adding 10 percentage points to their vote share, right?  That's actually a 20% swing.
Logged

n/c
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38875
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2008, 02:09:43 pm »
Ignore

Nor would a 10% swing in WA make it >60 Bush.  I assume you're just adding 10 percentage points to their vote share, right?  That's actually a 20% swing.

I was working pretty fast, and made a mistake.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7350
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2008, 07:55:13 pm »
Ignore



Plus 10% to Dole and minus 10% for Clinton.
Logged

the birth of modern america & onward timeline(http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=195483.new#new)results of four most previous elections.....
election 1912
Underwood: 267 Cutchens: 264 Lafolette: 0 Debs: 0 266 to win
election 1916
Underwood (i): 224 Curtis: 254 Johnson: 53 266 to win
House Underwood (i): 26 Curtis: 12 Johnson: 10 25 to win
election 1920
Roosevelt: 260 Lowden: 271 McAdoo: 0 266 to win
election 1924
Thomas: 262 Lowden (i): 269 266 to win
Iosif is a COTHO
Mango
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 475
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -5.04

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2008, 10:49:01 pm »
Ignore

10% to Dukakis (i.e +5 for Dukakis, -5 for Bush)



Dukakis: 280
Bush: 258





10% to Mondale



Reagan: 418
Mondale: 120


Logged
Iosif is a COTHO
Mango
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 475
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -5.04

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2008, 11:02:34 pm »
Ignore

10% to Carter 1980 (-3.5 Reagan, -1,5 Anderson, +5 Carter)



Carter: 283
Reagan: 255


If you leave out Anderson and make it a straight swing against Reagan of 10, Carter gains Connecticut and Oregon.


10% to McGovern



Nixon: 492
McGovern: 46



Logged
Iosif is a COTHO
Mango
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 475
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -5.04

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2008, 11:13:06 pm »
Ignore

10% to Humphrey (+5 Humphrey, -4 Nixon, -1 Humphrey) (In Deep South, -3 Nixon, -2 Wallace)



10% to Goldwater



Johnson: 440
Goldwater: 98
Logged
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30667
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2008, 11:53:10 pm »
Ignore

1960 (+5 Kennedy, -5 Nixon)

Kennedy: 469
Nixon: 68
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8507
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2008, 01:20:38 am »
Ignore

1940: Roosevelt/Wallace (D) vs. Willkie/McNary (R) 10% to Willkie



Wendell Willkie (R): 397 EV
Franklin D. Roosevelt (D): 134 EV
Logged



Here's to the State of Richard Nixon

Some things are better left covered up.
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8507
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2008, 02:05:39 am »
Ignore

1936: Roosevelt/Garner (D) vs. Landon/Knox (R): 10% to Landon



Franklin D. Roosevelt (D): 300 EV
Alf Landon (R): 231 EV
Logged



Here's to the State of Richard Nixon

Some things are better left covered up.
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7350
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2008, 11:31:29 am »
Ignore



A squeaker of a reelection victory for Hoover

Franklin Roosevelt: 261
Herbert Hoover: 270

Logged

the birth of modern america & onward timeline(http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=195483.new#new)results of four most previous elections.....
election 1912
Underwood: 267 Cutchens: 264 Lafolette: 0 Debs: 0 266 to win
election 1916
Underwood (i): 224 Curtis: 254 Johnson: 53 266 to win
House Underwood (i): 26 Curtis: 12 Johnson: 10 25 to win
election 1920
Roosevelt: 260 Lowden: 271 McAdoo: 0 266 to win
election 1924
Thomas: 262 Lowden (i): 269 266 to win
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30667
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2008, 12:10:40 pm »
Ignore

1952 (+5 Stevenson, -5 Eisenhower)

Eisenhower: 288
Stevenson: 243

1956 (+5 Stevenson, -5 Eisenhower)

Eisenhower: 408
Stevenson: 123
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8507
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2008, 03:33:02 pm »
Ignore

1944: Roosevelt/Truman (D) vs. Dewey/Bricker (R): 10% to Dewey



Thomas Dewey/John W. Bricker (R): 400 EV
Franklin D. Roosevelt/Harry Truman (D): 131 EV
Logged



Here's to the State of Richard Nixon

Some things are better left covered up.
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4685
Slovenia


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2008, 08:37:46 pm »
Ignore

+5% to Wallace, 1968  (done proportionally to his vote in each state, so some of the results for the states he did win are more than a bit messed up):



Nixon: 256
Humphrey: 191
Wallace: 91
Logged
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30667
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2008, 10:16:56 pm »
Ignore

1976 (+5 Carter, -5 Ford):

Carter: 506
Ford: 32

1928: (+5 Smith, -5 Hoover):

Hoover: 319
Smith: 212
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines