911 Investigation

[opebo]

We know what happened.  We all saw it on TV.

Nothing I saw on TV implicated 'al Queda'.

I'm pretty sure bin Laden took responsibility for the events in a video.

Rather dubious claim, and anyway the real question is not if he did it but whether he was working for the CIA at the time.

[dead0man]

The best part is, there doesn't have to be any proof at all when you accuse the CIA!  What style do you wear your tin hat opebo?  Over the ear?  Chin strap?

[opebo]

The best part is, there doesn't have to be any proof at all when you accuse the CIA!  What style do you wear your tin hat opebo?  Over the ear?  Chin strap?

My point is the other side of that same coin, deadman - we have no way of knowing what they may have done.  Certainly the act of 9/11 would have been one of the biggest acheivements in their history - it has worked absolute wonders.

[Frodo]

No, I do not support a second 9/11 Commission.  Despite the shortcomings of the first commission (after-the-fact admissions of CIA destruction of crucial tapes, etc.), enough good has come out of its recommendations that I see no need why taxpayers should have to foot the bill for what will essentially be a duplicate.

[SPC]

Right, because these things are free! 

We should also have them investigate the Moon landings, water dowsing, ghosts, Roswell and Big Foot.  It's all the same BS.

Good point. I would not support taxpayer money to have another investigation. However, I'm sure that there would be more than enough Alex Joneses and Michael Moores and Cindy Sheehans that would be willing to fund an investigation with their own personal fortunes.

However, I would just like to point out that I don't believe the US government was behind 911. However, with headlines like "Bin Laden Determined to Strike America" mere weeks before the attacks, there is reason to be suspicious of why the government didnt do more to prevent it from happening.

There are literally thousands of reasons to dislike and distrust this government and you people latch on to this?

I should point out that in my year and a half as a member of this forum, this is the first time I've mentioned a second 911 commission. I've been criticizing the federal government on tons of other issues. I don't obsess over 911.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

No, I do not support a second 9/11 Commission.  Despite the shortcomings of the first commission (after-the-fact admissions of CIA destruction of crucial tapes, etc.), enough good has come out of its recommendations that I see no need why taxpayers should have to foot the bill for what will essentially be a duplicate.

I don't think the taxpayers would have to pay for a Senatorial investigation.

[YRABNNRM]

No, I do not support a second 9/11 Commission.  Despite the shortcomings of the first commission (after-the-fact admissions of CIA destruction of crucial tapes, etc.), enough good has come out of its recommendations that I see no need why taxpayers should have to foot the bill for what will essentially be a duplicate.

I don't think the taxpayers would have to pay for a Senatorial investigation.

Someone would have to pay for it.

[dead0man]

No, I do not support a second 9/11 Commission.  Despite the shortcomings of the first commission (after-the-fact admissions of CIA destruction of crucial tapes, etc.), enough good has come out of its recommendations that I see no need why taxpayers should have to foot the bill for what will essentially be a duplicate.

I don't think the taxpayers would have to pay for a Senatorial investigation.

Who do you think would pay for it?

[Ebowed]

Nope.  9/11 truthers should go back to playing WoW.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

[Frodo]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

Shall we also investigate whether the 1969 Moon landings actually happened?

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

I actually believe the Kennedy results.

[??????????]

Only morons like Pastor Jeremiah Wright believe that garbage.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Only morons like Pastor Jeremiah Wright believe that garbage.

Which bit of garbage?

[??????????]

Only morons like Pastor Jeremiah Wright believe that garbage.

Which bit of garbage?

the OMG THE US BLEW IT UP nonsense.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Only morons like Pastor Jeremiah Wright believe that garbage.

Which bit of garbage?

the OMG THE US BLEW IT UP nonsense.

I have a slightly earthier word for that nonesense.

[SPC]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

Shall we also investigate whether the 1969 Moon landings actually happened?

No, because no one died as a direct result of the moon landing, whereas 3,000 people died as a direct result of 9-11.

[SPC]

Right, because these things are free! 

We should also have them investigate the Moon landings, water dowsing, ghosts, Roswell and Big Foot.  It's all the same BS.

Once again, none of those things actually killed anybody. 3,000 people died as a direct result of 9/11.

[dead0man]

Once again, what do you want to accomplish with another investigation?

[Middle-aged Europe]

What about a new Roswell investigtation?

Personally, I think it was a weather ballon... but did it actually come from Earth?

[dead0man]

No, it was a weather balloon from Venus!

[Middle-aged Europe]

No, it was a weather balloon from Venus!

Actually, my theory was directed at Hurricania 7, the cloud planet in the Blizzard galaxy.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

Shall we also investigate whether the 1969 Moon landings actually happened?

No, because no one died as a direct result of the moon landing, whereas 3,000 people died as a direct result of 9-11.

That, and it was already thoroughly investigated - by the Soviets.  We were in the middle of the Cold War - do you really think that they didn't have their top analysts investigating our moon landing?

[SPC]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

Shall we also investigate whether the 1969 Moon landings actually happened?

No, because no one died as a direct result of the moon landing, whereas 3,000 people died as a direct result of 9-11.

That, and it was already thoroughly investigated - by the Soviets.  We were in the middle of the Cold War - do you really think that they didn't have their top analysts investigating our moon landing?

I never said I believed any of those conspiracy theories. Only morons think we didn't land on the moon.

[dead0man]

Yes - as well as the Kennedy assassination.  I believe the current 9/11 findings, but not Kennedy, but looking at it again after 7 years can't hurt.

Shall we also investigate whether the 1969 Moon landings actually happened?

No, because no one died as a direct result of the moon landing, whereas 3,000 people died as a direct result of 9-11.

That, and it was already thoroughly investigated - by the Soviets.  We were in the middle of the Cold War - do you really think that they didn't have their top analysts investigating our moon landing?

I never said I believed any of those conspiracy theories. Only morons think we didn't land on the moon.

...or that more than one guy shot JFK, or Bush was behind 9-11, or it was pre-planted explosives that brought down buildings that day, or a missle into the Pentagon, or 80mpg cars being kept down by big oil....