Battle of the Partisan Hacks: Round 2 (Democrats)

[tik 🪀✨]

The finale round for each party has begun! Vote for the one most partisan and hackish Democrat. The poll will be run as the previous two have, although for this round, you will be allowed to change your vote.

Yesterday's Republican thread ended much closer than its Democratic counterpart. Naso won with 23 votes (22.3% of all votes and 66% of everyone who voted), followed closely by the self-proclaimed most partisan member htmldon who garnered 20 votes. Third place was a close contest between gporter and AHDuke, where the former finished with one vote more at 17. Trailing was DownWithTheLeft at 10, J.J. with 9, and finally Winfield with 8.

Feel free to find an especially ridiculous post that highlights the hackishness of your choice!

[Eraserhead]

Conan

[Kaine for Senate '18]

BRTD, for too many reasons to list.

[Person Man]

I have a feeling that I will not be surprised.

[tik 🪀✨]

I have a feeling that I will not be surprised.

Considering the results of the first round, yeah.

But the final poll should be very interesting.

[Ban my account ffs!]

Harry

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I proudly voted for myself.

[NDN]

BRTD. This isn't even close.

[Gustaf]

BRTD is certainly not the most partisan hack.

1. He loathes and attacks several leading Democratic figures such as a certain presidential candidate from New York.
2. He'll actually make decent predictions and acknowledge his candidates can't win all races.

This is definitely between Harry and Conan.

[7,052,770]

One party is right and the other party is wrong.  I naturally support the one that is right.

[Speed of Sound]

To a hack, no democrat is a fake democrat. Harry.

[Хahar 🤔]

Harry for sure.

[tik 🪀✨]

BRTD is certainly not the most partisan hack.

1. He loathes and attacks several leading Democratic figures such as a certain presidential candidate from New York.
2. He'll actually make decent predictions and acknowledge his candidates can't win all races.

This is definitely between Harry and Conan.

It's a problem of exposure. Most people are more aware of BRTD's outspokenness (to put it lightly).

[Joe Republic]

To a hack, no democrat is a fake democrat. Harry.

Agreed.  Besides, what's the use in punishing BRTD like this if he doesn't even feel remorse?

[tik 🪀✨]

To a hack, no democrat is a fake democrat. Harry.

Agreed.  Besides, what's the use in punishing BRTD like this if he doesn't even feel remorse?

If a hack is ashamed of his hackishness, is he really a hack at all?

[7,052,770]

F*** all of you idiots who voted for BRTD instead of me.

Are you so unobservant that you haven't heard a THING BRTD as said about Hillary, a DEMOCRATIC candidate?

[Joe Republic]

F*** all of you idiots who voted for BRTD instead of me.

Are you so unobservant that you haven't heard a THING BRTD as said about Hillary, a DEMOCRATIC candidate?

I think you've also misunderstood something very vital here, Harry:  being a partisan hack is not something to be proud of.  You had a narrow escape here.

[Eraserhead]

F*** all of you idiots who voted for BRTD instead of me.

Are you so unobservant that you haven't heard a THING BRTD as said about Hillary, a DEMOCRATIC candidate?

Perhaps you shouldn't have supported Lieberman in '06. A true Democratic hack would have supported him the primary, but not the general (since he technically wasn't the Democratic candidate).