My 2008 prediction.... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:29:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  My 2008 prediction.... (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: My 2008 prediction....  (Read 45731 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« on: February 14, 2004, 08:33:16 PM »

Lautenberg is like 140 years old.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2004, 08:38:54 PM »

If Bush wins:

Democratic Ticket: Hillary Clinton/Evan Bayh
Republican Ticket: Bill Frist/ Lamar Alexander

Turnout is record low, and Frist wins by a hair.  everybody hates both candidates.

If Bush loses:

Democratic Ticket: John Kerry/John Edwards
Republican Ticket: Jeb Bush/Condi Rice

Kerry wins re-election.

2012 (if Kerry wins two terms):

Democratic Ticket: John Edwards/Erksine Bowles (Who gives a crap if they're from the same state)
Republican Ticket: Lamar Alexander/George P. Bush

Alexander wins.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2004, 08:47:15 PM »

While a Rice run is a possible situation, Giuliani is more likely since he says he might run for NYC SENATE in 2006.
New York City Senate?  No such thing.  There is a City Council, a State Senate, and the US senate (what I think you mean).
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2004, 08:53:46 PM »

I hope Hillary loses to Rudy in 2006, because then we can get a halfway electable canddiate for 2008.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2004, 08:57:34 PM »

I hope Hillary loses to Rudy in 2006, because then we can get a halfway electable canddiate for 2008.

Why is Hillary Clinton unelectable?
Waaaay too polarizing.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2004, 10:09:32 PM »

Bushalva had a strange prediction....the Dems won't nominate barnes when they have big names like Hillary, Gore, and Edwards on the table.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2004, 09:50:54 AM »

Larry Sabato's map isn't for what he thinks would happen, but what the best case secario for the Dem could be.  Keep that in mind.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2004, 10:33:52 AM »

The Dems are not going to pick up Missouri or Arizona in 2004, in fact NV is a long shot.
Opebo, You ALWAYS overestimate Bush's support.  The thing is, if bush will hold on, it will be because of Kerry, not because of bush.  If edwards was the nominee, Bush would have NO chance.  I mean, none.  Kerry is a weak candidate, can Bush, who is up to his lip in slime, might hang on by a thread.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2004, 06:18:42 PM »

We need two generally unknowns who get the nominations. For examples: WHO WOULD WIN?

Gop: Mike Huckabee/Robert Riley
Dem: Robert Byrd/Kent Conrad
President Huckabee or President Byrd?

Gop: Katherine Harris/John Hoeven
Dem: Thomas Carper/Bob Wise
President Harris or President Carper?

Gop: Rick Perry/Robert Ehrlich
Dem: Phil Bredesen/Byron Dorgon
President Perry or President Bredesen?
Presidents Huckabee, Carper, and Bredesen.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2004, 08:27:54 PM »

She's an attractive, young, conservative republican and Secretary of State for Florida. Why not?

attractive?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2004, 09:12:06 PM »

yes, she's nothing compared to Granholm
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2004, 09:47:03 PM »

Ick
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2004, 01:10:31 PM »

That's even worse...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2004, 04:47:22 PM »

I would take Jennifer Granholm over her anyday.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2004, 04:52:49 PM »

Whoever NHPOlitico just posted isn't really that attractive.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2004, 04:57:15 PM »

Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2004, 04:59:44 PM »

Who, in the political world, are you a fan of, then?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2004, 05:02:28 PM »

Rice, Powell, Giuliani, or McCain could win in a heartbeat. Name reconization, you name it. Even against Hillary who is NOT attractive!!!!!
No, she is not by any stretch of the imagination.

Lisa Murkowski is okay...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2004, 05:32:33 PM »

Mirkowski is better than Lincoln.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #19 on: February 17, 2004, 05:34:05 PM »

Which one is Murkowski and which is Lincoln?
The one on the top is Murkowski.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #20 on: February 17, 2004, 05:40:10 PM »

Deocratic Senator Maria Cantwell from Washington.... wow, she is attractive. Why can't SHE BE a Republican LOL
Not really.

Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #21 on: February 17, 2004, 05:42:21 PM »

Which one is Murkowski and which is Lincoln?
The one on the top is Murkowski.

Then Lincoln is better, though she seems younger.
But Lincoln's hair is like a rag.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2004, 05:47:17 PM »

Which one is Murkowski and which is Lincoln?
The one on the top is Murkowski.

Then Lincoln is better, though she seems younger.
But Lincoln's hair is like a rag.

Who cares about the hair... Wink
Oh god...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2004, 04:57:46 PM »

I thought you were trying to say something.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #24 on: February 18, 2004, 05:01:10 PM »

I thought you were trying to say something.

Saying what?

I am not that interested in hair, that's all... Wink


Never mind. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 14 queries.