The Federalist League
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:25:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Federalist League		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: The Federalist League  (Read 4743 times)
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: December 27, 2004, 11:39:27 PM »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on December 27, 2004, 11:37:16 PM
I'd be more than happy having New Mexico, but I will not surrender Montana. The Midwest can have Utah.
Given Beef's move to Montana, I can see why you want to keep it! I have no problem swapping NM for UT - there aren't any voters in UT so that would still work out.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: December 28, 2004, 12:39:26 AM »
Quote from: Senator-Elect WMS on December 27, 2004, 11:39:27 PM
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on December 27, 2004, 11:37:16 PM
I'd be more than happy having New Mexico, but I will not surrender Montana. The Midwest can have Utah.
Given Beef's move to Montana, I can see why you want to keep it! I have no problem swapping NM for UT - there aren't any voters in UT so that would still work out.

Wyoming would be better.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: December 28, 2004, 12:53:21 AM »
Quote from: King on December 28, 2004, 12:39:26 AM
Quote from: Senator-Elect WMS on December 27, 2004, 11:39:27 PM
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on December 27, 2004, 11:37:16 PM
I'd be more than happy having New Mexico, but I will not surrender Montana. The Midwest can have Utah.
Given Beef's move to Montana, I can see why you want to keep it! I have no problem swapping NM for UT - there aren't any voters in UT so that would still work out.

Wyoming would be better.

Sadly, according to the regional map here:
http://www.uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?board=13;action=display;threadid=5379
Wyoming already is in the Midwest. So that leaves Montana or Utah to swap in return, and Montana now has a voter in it - Beef.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: December 28, 2004, 11:20:48 AM »
I don't want no Utah!

Shifting Montana over to the Midwest would be a good thing, so our population stays the name.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: December 28, 2004, 11:44:44 AM »
Quote from: Bored Governor Ilikeverin on December 28, 2004, 11:20:48 AM
I don't want no Utah!

Shifting Montana over to the Midwest would be a good thing, so our population stays the name.
As you should have learned from the last redistricting, your population is supposed to be falling, not stable. .)
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: December 29, 2004, 12:17:34 AM »
Quote from: Bored Governor Ilikeverin on December 28, 2004, 11:20:48 AM
I don't want no Utah!

Shifting Montana over to the Midwest would be a good thing, so our population stays the name.

Heh heh...a Regional squabble. Smiley Check out your own Midwest Government-ish thread to see an alternative, ILikeVerin! Kiki
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.