AK: Research 2000: McCain beats Obama by 7, but Clinton by 18

[bgwah]

I imagine air time in Alaska is relatively inexpensive. Might as well run ads there, Obama has the money.

Alaska also may be a state where Bob Barr/Mike Gravel ends up doing reasonably well.

My thoughts exactly. Yes, the only has three electoral votes---but this also means it won't be very expensive to run ads there. It certainly couldn't hurt. And I have also considered the Libertarian thing--Ed Clark got more than 10% here. It probably won't happen, but it would be pretty hilarious if the Libertarian candidate somehow drained enough votes from McCain and managed to give Obama a small victory here.

[bgwah]

I like how three close polls in Alaska spell victory to Democrats, yet many close polls in Massachusetts spell continuous outliers.

Haha, what?

Do you guys even read the posts in this thread?

Fezzy and Duke = retarded trolls

[bgwah]

I like how three close polls in Alaska spell victory to Democrats, yet many close polls in Massachusetts spell continuous outliers.

Haha, what?

Do you guys even read the posts in this thread?

Fezzy and Duke = retarded trolls

What does that make you? A mindless follower of the masses on this forum? Forgive us for disagreeing with the great Obama and his supporters!

Did you read the thread? You didn't see anyone suggesting he could win Alaska?

Yes, I can actually read. I saw people suggesting that it would not hurt if Obama campaigned and/or advertised in Alaska. I saw no one say they actually thought Obama would seriously win it.

But hey, don't mind me, f**kwad. Go on being the dumbest and most worthless douche bag on the forum. It's the only thing you're good at.

[bgwah]

I like how three close polls in Alaska spell victory to Democrats, yet many close polls in Massachusetts spell continuous outliers.

Haha, what?

Do you guys even read the posts in this thread?

Fezzy and Duke = retarded trolls

What does that make you? A mindless follower of the masses on this forum? Forgive us for disagreeing with the great Obama and his supporters!

Did you read the thread? You didn't see anyone suggesting he could win Alaska?

Yes, I can actually read. I saw people suggesting that it would not hurt if Obama campaigned and/or advertised in Alaska. I saw no one say they actually thought Obama would seriously win it.

But hey, don't mind me, f**kwad. Go on being the dumbest and most worthless douche bag on the forum. It's the only thing you're good at.

Boo hoo. Like I give a rats ass what most of the posters, especially mindless Obamaniacs, think about me on this forum. I'm here to be a dick and argue politics because that's what I like to do in my spare time/when I'm at work/school, not to make lifelong friends and impress people by outdoing everyone on the competition involving showing our unconditional love for Barack Obama or how much we hate George Bush. But I'll quit because apparently you don't want to be embarrassed in front of everyone because it's oh so important to be well liked by everyone here. But, if I remember correctly, you are more hated than I am, so it looks like you have a lot of work to do!

Haha, wow. You're even dumber than I thought you were. I'm impressed!

[bgwah]

I like how three close polls in Alaska spell victory to Democrats, yet many close polls in Massachusetts spell continuous outliers.

Haha, what?

Do you guys even read the posts in this thread?

Fezzy and Duke = retarded trolls

What does that make you? A mindless follower of the masses on this forum? Forgive us for disagreeing with the great Obama and his supporters!

Did you read the thread? You didn't see anyone suggesting he could win Alaska?

Yes, I can actually read. I saw people suggesting that it would not hurt if Obama campaigned and/or advertised in Alaska. I saw no one say they actually thought Obama would seriously win it.

But hey, don't mind me, f**kwad. Go on being the dumbest and most worthless douche bag on the forum. It's the only thing you're good at.

Boo hoo. Like I give a rats ass what most of the posters, especially mindless Obamaniacs, think about me on this forum. I'm here to be a dick and argue politics because that's what I like to do in my spare time/when I'm at work/school, not to make lifelong friends and impress people by outdoing everyone on the competition involving showing our unconditional love for Barack Obama or how much we hate George Bush. But I'll quit because apparently you don't want to be embarrassed in front of everyone because it's oh so important to be well liked by everyone here. But, if I remember correctly, you are more hated than I am, so it looks like you have a lot of work to do!

Haha, wow. You're even dumber than I thought you were. I'm impressed!

Excellent comeback. You are really outdoing yourself. "You're dumb" as a defense stopped working after first grade, my friend.

So much for quitting, eh? Your post was just more of your made up clueless bullsh**t.

But really--you admitted that you're a dick and a troll. You basically agreed with me.   A lengthy and witty rebuttal isn't necessary.

[bgwah]

"I'm here to be a dick" translates to trolling, in my opinion.