President Carter vs. Senator Dole-1980
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:16:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  President Carter vs. Senator Dole-1980
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: President Carter vs. Senator Dole-1980  (Read 3455 times)
GPORTER
gporter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 29, 2008, 06:40:52 PM »

Ronald Reagan decides not to run for the presidency again in 1976. He endorses no one for the nomination. Former vice presidential nominee and incumbent senator Bob Dole beats George Bush and the other candidates for the republican nomination. Incumbent President Jimmy Carter wins renomination after defeating Ted Kennedy in the primaries. Bob Dole selects Howard Baker of Tennessee as his running mate. Jimmy Carter makes the decision to keep Walter Mondale on the ticket with him. There is no third party candidacy.

The tickets look like this...Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondalevs.Bob Dole/Howard Baker

Discuss and analyze. Use maps if you wish.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2008, 06:47:45 PM »


Dole wins, 318-220.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2008, 07:12:20 PM »

As I recall, the closest states were all in the South, and Dole will play well in the Midwest.  I don't give the Bush endorsement that much weight; it was close in 1980, with Bush on the ticket, so it goes narrowly for Carter.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2008, 07:38:22 PM »

As I recall, the closest states were all in the South, and Dole will play well in the Midwest.  I don't give the Bush endorsement that much weight; it was close in 1980, with Bush on the ticket, so it goes narrowly for Carter.
Texas was close in 1980 and Wisconsin was not? The only close states were in the south? That is stupid. You know less about Presidential politics than you claim that I do.

I never said the things you just said I did.  The closest states were mostly in the South; of the 10 closest, 7 were in the South, along with MA, HI, and DE.  Outside of Dixie, most of the Anderson supporters were Republicans who would have gone to Dole, keeping those states for him.
Logged
Saxwsylvania
Van Der Blub
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,534


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2008, 07:38:37 PM »

As I recall, the closest states were all in the South, and Dole will play well in the Midwest.  I don't give the Bush endorsement that much weight; it was close in 1980, with Bush on the ticket, so it goes narrowly for Carter.
Texas was close in 1980 and Wisconsin was not? The only close states were in the south? That is stupid. You know less about Presidential politics than you claim that I do.

Oh, just shut the hell up already.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2008, 10:25:02 PM »

Dole wasn't a significantly weaker candidate in 1980 (as compared to 1996) and Carter was unpopular enough that virtually any candidate could beat him.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2008, 11:03:12 PM »
« Edited: May 30, 2008, 01:48:31 AM by Senator Conor Flynn »

As I recall, the closest states were all in the South, and Dole will play well in the Midwest.  I don't give the Bush endorsement that much weight; it was close in 1980, with Bush on the ticket, so it goes narrowly for Carter.
Texas was close in 1980 and Wisconsin was not? The only close states were in the south? That is stupid. You know less about Presidential politics than you claim that I do.

Oh, just shut the hell up already.

I concur with Vander Blubb more than 1000%. Moreso than McGovern's 1000% statement regarding Senator Thomas Eagleton. Please shut up Garrison. Please. You do know, that you have said that statement towards Ben more than 100 times and numerous others I'm sure.

As for this scenario, I shall provide an Electoral Map later. I would now,but creating an Electoral Map on the school computers takes forever. But it will be no surprise that my map will show a Dole/Baker victory.



Robert J. Dole/Howard H. Baker (R): 308 EV, 51% of the PV
James E. Carter/Walter F. Mondale (D): 230 EV, 49% of the PV
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2008, 04:15:28 PM »

In 1980, Howard Baker was the Senate Republican Leader.  How is that not experience?  Sometimes, I think you create Democratic victories to avoid being called a hack.  No way Carter wins in 1980, no way.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2008, 07:36:18 PM »

As I recall, the closest states were all in the South, and Dole will play well in the Midwest.  I don't give the Bush endorsement that much weight; it was close in 1980, with Bush on the ticket, so it goes narrowly for Carter.
Texas was close in 1980 and Wisconsin was not? The only close states were in the south? That is stupid. You know less about Presidential politics than you claim that I do.

I never said the things you just said I did.  The closest states were mostly in the South; of the 10 closest, 7 were in the South, along with MA, HI, and DE.  Outside of Dixie, most of the Anderson supporters were Republicans who would have gone to Dole, keeping those states for him.

First of all, you do not take criticism well, do you?

You said that you never said that Texas was close in 1980. When you said in one of your posts in this thread of Texas that "it was close in 1980." Do you call a fourteen point margin close? You must think that Utah and the District of Columbia were close in 2004.

You also said that the top ten closest states in 1980 were the southern ones and Delaware, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. Do you consider Kentucky to be a southern state, last time I checked it was not.

And, Carter could have won in 1980. The polls were tight up until a few days until the election. Had the hostages been set free in the final days while the polls were still tight, do you not think that he would have had a shot at it?

If I were making democratic victory maps only to avoid being called a hack, then I would give Walter Mondale and George McGovern victories in the years and under the circumstances that they ran in.

The margin in Utah was 45.54%, and in DC it was >80%.  Those weren't close.  And I said 7 out of 10 were Southern; I consider Kentucky Southern; that sort of thing is up for interpretation.

I've never given Mondale and McGovern victories; no sane person would give either of them a victory.

Gporter, do you enjoy attacking me with false, and, more importantly, pathetic attcks?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2008, 08:26:01 PM »

I know, I was making a point about McGovern y Mondale.  There's a huge difference between 14% and 80%.  Go back to math class and learn that.

You can stand up for yourself, but your attacks on other people are baseless, and you make the same mistakes.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2008, 08:33:11 PM »

You are the one who should go back to math class because you did not know that two negative numbres can sometimes equal a positive number.

I hate to interfere in another priceless dispute, but yes he did.  The figure of speech was clear to anybody (but you, it would seem).
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2008, 09:15:40 PM »

You are the one who should go back to math class because you did not know that two negative numbres can sometimes equal a positive number.

I hate to interfere in another priceless dispute, but yes he did.  The figure of speech was clear to anybody (but you, it would seem).

He'll be calling you a hack soon, now that you've defended me.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2008, 09:40:46 PM »


¿Hablas español?
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 30, 2008, 09:42:07 PM »

It is a common mistake that Bob Dole was a "weak candidate." In his prime (1980 and 1988) Dole was both a witty, charming heartland staesman, and a no hold barred attack dog. In 1980 the economy was a mess, Soviets were in Afghanistan, hostages were in Tehran and America was in that famous "malaise." Alhtough I believe that much of this was not his fault, President Carter would not have been reelected against any of the Republicans with that record. Much like Hoover in 1932, he was doomed.

I would expect Clark and the Libertarians to do much better with Dole as the GOP nominee. Dole had been on record of voting for increased agricultural subsides, detente with the Soviets, corporate welfare and voting to increase the Social Security system. Reagan ran as a libertarian in 1980, taking votes from Clark/Koch.  



Bob Dole/Howard Baker (R): 381 EV; 48.1% of the PV
Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale (D): 157 EV; 41.0% of the PV
Ed Clark/David Koch (L): 0 EV; 9.4% of the PV
Others (Consumer, Socialist, etc.): 0 EV; 0.5% of the PV
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2008, 09:54:17 PM »


Si.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2008, 09:58:25 PM »


If? Why if? What kind of stupid answer is "if"?
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2008, 09:58:59 PM »

After having served as one of the weakest and most incompetent Presidents in history, the abject failure of the Carter Presidency is rewarded accordingly by the voters.

Dole was an experienced and respected Senator,  nationally known well before 1980.

Baker was Senate Republican leader, and was as well experienced and respected.

Dole and Baker would have been a very strong ticket in 1980.  

Not as big a win as for Reagan, nonetheless, a solid win for Dole and Baker over Carter and Mondale.

Carter is handed a well deserved defeat.

The presence of Baker on the Dole ticket keeps Tennessee with the GOP.  

Instead of Reagan 489 Carter 49

Dole/Baker                  375
Carter/Mondale           163

Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2008, 10:00:40 PM »


Sorry, I don't have a special keys button on my computer.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2008, 10:23:43 PM »

Who gives a sh**t about accents anyways? Tongue
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2008, 10:29:02 PM »


You should. Just change your keyboard layout to US-International.

Who gives a sh**t about accents anyways? Tongue

I do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.