Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:44:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is there a moral difference between the two acts?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS)  (Read 2982 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: May 31, 2008, 12:06:34 PM »
Quote from: Verily on May 31, 2008, 11:44:39 AM
Yes, there is. Refusing to act to save someone's life is morally reprehensible but not as severe as committing an act of murder itself.

Agreed.  One is a massive failure of moral responsibility; the other is, well, murder.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 15 queries.