Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:59:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is there a moral difference between the two acts?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: Gustaf's philosophical question number 4 (NO TROLLEYS)  (Read 2979 times)
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« on: May 31, 2008, 08:18:49 PM »
Quote from: Alcon on May 31, 2008, 12:06:34 PM
Quote from: Verily on May 31, 2008, 11:44:39 AM
Yes, there is. Refusing to act to save someone's life is morally reprehensible but not as severe as committing an act of murder itself.

Agreed.  One is a massive failure of moral responsibility; the other is, well, murder.

Exactly. Both are terrible acts, though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.