Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 01:30:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 ... 252
Author Topic: Washington 2020: The Calm Before the Drizzle  (Read 844191 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3200 on: February 25, 2012, 01:38:43 PM »

No, I'm not a Republican.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3201 on: February 25, 2012, 01:48:18 PM »


So?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3202 on: February 27, 2012, 02:01:36 PM »

I think I might observe, but being a Democratic PCO, it seems inappropriate if I voted Tongue
Logged
Alaska2392
NRS11
Rookie
**
Posts: 85
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3203 on: February 28, 2012, 12:31:47 AM »

Oh boy, I'm so excited that the words "redefine marriage" are in the in Referendum 74 proposed ballot language.  Thank you Rob McKenna.  I can see a judge ruling either way on this one.  Reminds me in a strange way of the Rossi "Prefers GOP Party".
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3204 on: February 28, 2012, 08:45:00 AM »
« Edited: February 28, 2012, 08:58:05 AM by Nathan »

Oh boy, I'm so excited that the words "redefine marriage" are in the in Referendum 74 proposed ballot language.

God damn it. Oh well. More work for the HRC lawyers and ad people.

I imagine this will be somewhat easier, purely structurally speaking, in Maryland.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3205 on: March 02, 2012, 12:31:54 PM »

Norm Dicks is retiring? Why haven't we heard about this from our Pierce County people? Tongue

at least one of them will have to make sure we know that he already knew, and that he just didn't want to tell us cuz he's cool and keeps awesome secrets
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3206 on: March 02, 2012, 12:36:53 PM »
« Edited: March 02, 2012, 12:56:24 PM by bgwah »

Also, can we redraw the 6th and 10th districts now? Please?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3207 on: March 02, 2012, 01:56:08 PM »

I had no idea about Norm Dicks and hadn't actually heard anyone even suggest the possibility.  But then again I can count the times I've had a serious interaction with Dicks or his staffers on one hand.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3208 on: March 02, 2012, 02:05:25 PM »

I had no idea about Norm Dicks and hadn't actually heard anyone even suggest the possibility.  But then again I can count the times I've had a serious interaction with Dicks or his staffers on one hand.

Okay, okay. But who will run!?

Laurie Jenkins for Congress? Wink
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3209 on: March 02, 2012, 02:49:01 PM »

I'm hearing a lot now, but I'm mostly hearing Derek Kilmer.

Other names I've heard floated are Jim Hargrove and Mark Lindquist.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3210 on: March 03, 2012, 12:46:25 AM »

How liberal is the district? I know that under the old lines the PVI was D+5, but does the GOP how a shot of making a race under the new lines?
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3211 on: March 03, 2012, 12:49:27 AM »

Oh boy, I'm so excited that the words "redefine marriage" are in the in Referendum 74 proposed ballot language.

God damn it. Oh well. More work for the HRC lawyers and ad people.

I imagine this will be somewhat easier, purely structurally speaking, in Maryland.

This is why Attorney Generals need to stop creating the ballot language on propositions, and let State Supreme Courts do so. The way the initiative is phrased could swing a fair number of people in one direction.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3212 on: March 03, 2012, 04:32:55 AM »

I will not be reporting from the GOP caucus tomorrow because I'm not going with a headache.  Keep us updated, RI!
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3213 on: March 03, 2012, 07:16:13 AM »

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017651307_budget03m.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

DINOs on fiscal issues?
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3214 on: March 03, 2012, 07:37:49 AM »

Finally some people have the courage to stand up and vote for the elimination of assistance programs for the disabled. That gravy train is over.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3215 on: March 03, 2012, 08:15:31 AM »

How liberal is the district? I know that under the old lines the PVI was D+5, but does the GOP how a shot of making a race under the new lines?

The estimate I heard was that it was about 59% Obama. And Republicans only have one state legislator in the district, so they have no bench.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3216 on: March 03, 2012, 08:45:06 AM »

I don't think anyone knew about Dicks; even the DCCC was caught completely off guard from what I've heard.

The district should theoretically be competitive but as Johnny mentioned there isn't really any Republican base to speak of. My biggest concern is that either Sheldon or Hargrove somehow end up winning.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3217 on: March 03, 2012, 12:35:31 PM »

Hargrove would be terrible. At least he's already 59 so if he did win, he wouldn't be around for 36 years. Tongue
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3218 on: March 03, 2012, 12:41:09 PM »

I just drew the district as best I could in DRA (I'm over by 16,000 people, some of the blocks in DRA look to be split between districts) and got 57.1 Obama, 40.8 McCain, and 52.8% Murray. So, no change, really.

57% Obama isn't completely safe, but after 2010 there are only four Republicans in districts that are 57% Obama or greater (Dold, Gerlach, Reichert, and Barletta). And Republicans don't have anyone of, say, Reichert's stature to run.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3219 on: March 04, 2012, 02:49:00 PM »

I don't think anyone knew about Dicks; even the DCCC was caught completely off guard from what I've heard.

The district should theoretically be competitive but as Johnny mentioned there isn't really any Republican base to speak of. My biggest concern is that either Sheldon or Hargrove somehow end up winning.

Sheldon, dear lord that would be horrible. Though he wouldn't be able to get away with his usual antics for very long; the US house of representatives is a much bigger magnifying glass than the WA senate.

Speaking of which I am dumbfounded by the stupidity of the three dem senators the other day, they basically shot themselves in the foot. There is no way their budget will get passed and instead the budget battle will just become even more intensely partisan and brutal.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3220 on: March 04, 2012, 07:18:05 PM »

How liberal is the district? I know that under the old lines the PVI was D+5, but does the GOP how a shot of making a race under the new lines?

The estimate I heard was that it was about 59% Obama. And Republicans only have one state legislator in the district, so they have no bench.

They could always recruit a self-funder, but yeah the peninsula hasn't been very fertile grounds for Republicans in recent years. I wasn't sure if redistricting had brought in some more conservative friendly parts from the Seattle suburbs or not.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3221 on: March 04, 2012, 08:58:17 PM »

I'm reading rumors that State Sen. Derek Kilmer (D-Gig Harbor) is going to declare for WA-6 soon.  I think this a positive development; certainly I would vastly prefer him to Sheldon or Hargrove.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3222 on: March 04, 2012, 10:14:11 PM »

I'm reading rumors that State Sen. Derek Kilmer (D-Gig Harbor) is going to declare for WA-6 soon.  I think this a positive development; certainly I would vastly prefer him to Sheldon or Hargrove.

I feel like Kilmer would be a very good fit for the district, and much more preferable to Sheldon [eww] or Hargrove [slightly less eww].
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3223 on: March 04, 2012, 10:34:25 PM »

Who would the Republicans run? I can't really think of anyone, other than maybe Jan Angel.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3224 on: March 04, 2012, 11:01:03 PM »

Who would the Republicans run? I can't really think of anyone, other than maybe Jan Angel.
Perrenial loser something Cloud?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 ... 252  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.074 seconds with 11 queries.